2019
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomically Informed Scoring Enhances Confidence in Natural Products Annotation

Abstract: Mass spectrometry (MS) offers unrivalled sensitivity for the metabolite profiling of complex biological matrices encountered in natural products (NP) research. The massive and complex sets of spectral data generated by such platforms require computational approaches for their interpretation. Within such approaches, computational metabolite annotation automatically links spectral data to candidate structures via a score, which is usually established between the acquired data and experimental or theoretical spec… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
105
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of multiple DB interrogation, the workflow allows compound annotations to be ranked based on MS-FINDER score only or by prioritizing certain DBs, depending on user choices. This latter function can greatly improve the annotation accuracy particularly when dealing with taxonomically defined extracts 30 . MS-CleanR can also prioritize compounds based on “Compound_level” column tuned by the user in external DBs used for MS-FINDER annotation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of multiple DB interrogation, the workflow allows compound annotations to be ranked based on MS-FINDER score only or by prioritizing certain DBs, depending on user choices. This latter function can greatly improve the annotation accuracy particularly when dealing with taxonomically defined extracts 30 . MS-CleanR can also prioritize compounds based on “Compound_level” column tuned by the user in external DBs used for MS-FINDER annotation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, taxonomically informed scoring was applied on the GNPS outputs using Solanum tuberosum as species, Solanum as genus, and Solanaceae as family, returning an attribute table which can be directly loaded in Cytoscape. The taxonomically informed metabolite annotation process has been previously described in detail (Rutz et al, 2019). The scripts are available online (taxo_scorer_user.Rmd) at https:// github.com/oolonek/taxo_scorer.…”
Section: Metabolite Annotationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, metabolite annotation was carried out by a combination of feature based molecular networking (FBMN) (Nothias et al, 2019) and dereplication against experimental data from the GNPS platform (http://gnps. ucsd.edu/) and against an in-silico fragmentation database (ISDB) weighted using taxonomical data ( Figure 5D) (Allard et al, 2016;Rutz et al, 2019). Furthermore, a selection of the annotated compounds was identified by comparison of the HRMS, MS/MS spectra and RT with authentic standards, which allowed the establishment of experimental anchor points and the confident propagation of annotations through the network.…”
Section: Cultivar-specific Metabolites Are Highlighted Using Untargetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Sources of additional information include, e.g. RT (Ruttkies et al, 2016;Bach et al, 2018;Samaraweera et al, 2018), collision crosssection (Plante et al, 2019), or prior knowledge on the data generating process, such as the source organism's metabolic characteristics (Rutz et al, 2019). Retention time, that is, the time that a molecule takes to elute from the LC column, is readily available in all LC-MS pipelines, and is frequently used in aiding annotation (Stanstrup et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%