2020
DOI: 10.1111/efp.12630
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomical re‐examination of the genus Phyllosticta—Parasitic fungi on Cupressaceae trees in Japan

Abstract: Taxonomical re‐examination of the Phyllosticta species parasitic fungi on coniferous trees (Cupressaceae) in Japan was conducted based on current criteria, such as morphological and cultural characteristics, phylogenetic relationship and pathogenicity. Phylogenetic analyses revealed several clades composed of plant pathogens isolated from a specific host as well as clades composed of endophytic species isolated from various Cupressaceae trees. Each clade was recognized as a species from the morphological chara… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ITS (8 bp, 7 bp), LSU (7 bp, 2 bp), tef1 (22 bp, 23 bp) and act (5 bp, 4 bp). Morphologically, P. rizhaoensis can be distinguished from them by having larger conidiogenous cells (7–14 × 2–6 in P. rizhaoensis vs 4–12 × 2–2.5 in P. pilospora and 5–12 × 3–5 in P. spinarum ), smaller conidia (8–12 × 5–7.5 μm in P. rizhaoensis vs 9.5–12 × 7–10 μm in P. pilospora and 10–15 × 7–8 μm in P. spinarum ) and the lack of an apical conidial appendage ( Wikee et al 2013b , Hattori et al . 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…ITS (8 bp, 7 bp), LSU (7 bp, 2 bp), tef1 (22 bp, 23 bp) and act (5 bp, 4 bp). Morphologically, P. rizhaoensis can be distinguished from them by having larger conidiogenous cells (7–14 × 2–6 in P. rizhaoensis vs 4–12 × 2–2.5 in P. pilospora and 5–12 × 3–5 in P. spinarum ), smaller conidia (8–12 × 5–7.5 μm in P. rizhaoensis vs 9.5–12 × 7–10 μm in P. pilospora and 10–15 × 7–8 μm in P. spinarum ) and the lack of an apical conidial appendage ( Wikee et al 2013b , Hattori et al . 2020 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The obtained DNA sequences in this study were used to calculate the sequence similarity using the BLASTn program ( https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi ). Reference sequences are listed in Table 2 ( Norphanphoun et al 2020 , Hattori et al 2020 , Nguyen et al 2022 , Tan & Shivas 2022 ). Sequence alignments were generated with MAFFT v. 7 ( https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/ , Katoh et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As of 25 October 2023, the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) (https: //www.gbif.org/, accessed on 25 October 2023) encompasses 9678 geo-referenced records of Phyllosticta species reported globally. The main distribution locations for these species are in America, Asia, and Europe, with the United States having the most extensive distribution [54,55]. Among the Phyllosticta species, P. carbitalensis, identified as a relatively weak plant pathogenic agent, is known to induce leaf spot diseases in various plants, including tea (Camellia sinensis), oil palm (Elaeis guineensis), Ricinus communis, and guava black spot [56,57] [8,14,33,44,45,[57][58][59][60] have notably enhanced the accuracy of Phyllosticta classification.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%