2021
DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2021.750.1357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic status of Macaronesian Eucyclops agiloides azorensis (Arthropoda: Crustacea: Copepoda) revisited – morphology suggests a Palearctic origin

Abstract: Macaronesia, with the exception of the Azores, is one of the few Palearctic provinces where basic taxonomic information on the freshwater copepods is still lacking. We redescribed Eucyclops azorensis, a cyclopid crustacean so far known only in the Azores, and report the occurrence of this species in Algeria and Madeira Island. Eucyclops azorensis was formerly considered to be a subspecies of E. agiloides (East Africa); therefore, the latter species is redescribed here as well based on type and non-type materia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,469 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although for other groups of copepods, some elements of micro-ornament have been shown to be very effective in distinguishing closely related species. For example, in the taxonomy of Cyclopidae, ornamentation of antenna allobasis (Fiers and Van de Velde 1984), maxilla basis (Hołyńska et al 2021), coxa of P4 (Van de Velde 1984) are used widely. Another difficult feature is that during the preparation of specimens or during the life of these crustaceans, some of the spines, especially long ones, can break off, and some wear out, so it is necessary to study at least a few individuals of each species.…”
Section: Analysis Of Differences Between Studied Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although for other groups of copepods, some elements of micro-ornament have been shown to be very effective in distinguishing closely related species. For example, in the taxonomy of Cyclopidae, ornamentation of antenna allobasis (Fiers and Van de Velde 1984), maxilla basis (Hołyńska et al 2021), coxa of P4 (Van de Velde 1984) are used widely. Another difficult feature is that during the preparation of specimens or during the life of these crustaceans, some of the spines, especially long ones, can break off, and some wear out, so it is necessary to study at least a few individuals of each species.…”
Section: Analysis Of Differences Between Studied Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%