1988
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90293-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic specificity of restriction-modification enzymes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The remaining strains await further investigation; they may produce either no restriction enzyme, or produce new Type I or other Types (II or III) of restriction enzymes. A previous survey of Type II restriction enzymes in E. coli revealed Type II isoschizomers at least in 25% (219/864) of the strains examined (14). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The remaining strains await further investigation; they may produce either no restriction enzyme, or produce new Type I or other Types (II or III) of restriction enzymes. A previous survey of Type II restriction enzymes in E. coli revealed Type II isoschizomers at least in 25% (219/864) of the strains examined (14). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…All three bacteria have an optimum growth temperature below 30ºC, but their optimum restriction activity temperature is at 37ºC. Four neoschizomers have been previously described with the same 5´GAG↓CTC3´ cleavage sequence; two have been described in Escherichia coli (7), and the two others in Myxococcus xantus (14) and Enterobacter cloacae (10).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Janulaitis et al [18] tested many strains belonging to Enterobacteriaceae and discovered that, with one exception, all isolated enzymes recognize 6‐bp DNA sequences. The only strain recognizing a 4‐bp sequence shared only 10% DNA homology with the rest of the family members.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%