2019
DOI: 10.3897/zookeys.898.46465
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic revision of the genus Machleida Fåhraeus, 1870 (Tenebrionidae, Pimeliinae, Asidini)

Abstract: The taxonomic concept of the genus Machleida Fåhraeus, 1870 is tested and revised based on newly identified material. The following new species are described: Machleida banachi, M. flagstaffensis, M. tarskii, and M. zofiae Kamiński. Machleida capillosa Wilke, 1925 is considered as a junior subjective synonym of Asida devia Péringuey, 1899. Asida lecta Péringuey, 1899 (= Pseudomachla recurva Wilke, 1925) (transferred to Afrasida), Machleida nossibiana Fairmaire, 1897 (transferred to Scotinesthes), and Machleida… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
(25 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phylogenetic species concept of Wheeler and Platnick (2000) was employed to define a species as "the smallest aggregation of (sexual) populations or (asexual) lineages diagnosable by a unique combination of character states". It was used in recent taxonomic works (Smith 2013;Smith and Wirth 2016;Kamiński et al 2019). Species are diagnosed by the presence of autapomorphic morphological characters and/or a unique combination of homoplastic characters shared by all of the specimens assigned to a species (Smith and Wirth 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phylogenetic species concept of Wheeler and Platnick (2000) was employed to define a species as "the smallest aggregation of (sexual) populations or (asexual) lineages diagnosable by a unique combination of character states". It was used in recent taxonomic works (Smith 2013;Smith and Wirth 2016;Kamiński et al 2019). Species are diagnosed by the presence of autapomorphic morphological characters and/or a unique combination of homoplastic characters shared by all of the specimens assigned to a species (Smith and Wirth 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%