2018
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4410.3.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic identity of the ghost ant, Tapinoma melanocephalum (Fabricius, 1793) (Formicidae: Dolichoderinae)

Abstract: This paper revises the taxonomy of Tapinoma melanocephalum (Fabricius, 1793) as follows: T. melanocephalum = Tapinoma luffae (Kuriam, 1955) syn. nov., = Tapinoma melanocephalum coronatum Forel, 1908 syn. nov., = Tapinoma melanocephalum malesianum Forel, 1913 syn. nov. A neotype of Tapinoma melanocephalum (Fabricius, 1793) is designed here. Lectotypes of Tapinoma melanocephalum coronatum Forel, 1908 and T. melanocephalum malesianum Forel, 1913 are designated. Formica wallacei is proposed as a replacement name f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,181 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In a small taxonomic revision, GUERRERO (2018) synonymized seven taxa with Tapinoma melanocephalum (FABRICIUS, 1793): Tapinoma nana (JERDON, 1851), Tapinoma pellucida (SMITH, 1857), Tapinoma familiaris (SMITH, 1860b), Tapinoma melanocephalum coronatum (FOREL, 1908), Tapinoma melanocephalum malesianum (FOREL, 1913), Tapinoma australis (SANTSCHI, 1928) and Tapinoma luffae (KURIAN, 1955). After examining z-stack photos of type specimens presented in www.antweb.org and by GUERRERO (2018), these synonymizations appeared reasonable to me in five taxa. In the two remaining taxa, T. nana and T. luffae, no counterevidence to GUERRERO's statements is possible because of missing type specimens and insufficient original description in the former taxon and presence of only slides of dissected male type specimens in the latter one (SINGH et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a small taxonomic revision, GUERRERO (2018) synonymized seven taxa with Tapinoma melanocephalum (FABRICIUS, 1793): Tapinoma nana (JERDON, 1851), Tapinoma pellucida (SMITH, 1857), Tapinoma familiaris (SMITH, 1860b), Tapinoma melanocephalum coronatum (FOREL, 1908), Tapinoma melanocephalum malesianum (FOREL, 1913), Tapinoma australis (SANTSCHI, 1928) and Tapinoma luffae (KURIAN, 1955). After examining z-stack photos of type specimens presented in www.antweb.org and by GUERRERO (2018), these synonymizations appeared reasonable to me in five taxa. In the two remaining taxa, T. nana and T. luffae, no counterevidence to GUERRERO's statements is possible because of missing type specimens and insufficient original description in the former taxon and presence of only slides of dissected male type specimens in the latter one (SINGH et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The photo files included 6 samples of Tapinoma indicum and T. minutum. The basis for morphometric evaluation of pictures were z-stack photographs of workers provided by www.antweb.org and one photo in GUERRERO (2018). Photo evaluation, which inevitably has a lower precision than direct stereomicroscopy, appeared promising because all four species considered here appeared easily separable.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a very frequent tropical species (see the taxonomic position in Guerrero 2018) and one of the most invasive ant species in the world.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only two other ant species that occur in South America, Tapinoma melanocephalum (Fabricius, 1793) and Linepithema leucomelas (Emery, 1894), have similar colors and size that could lead to confusion. In the case of T. melanocephalum, a common invasive species, the head and mesosoma is dark brown and the gaster is pale yellow (Guerrero 2018). Linepithema leucomelas can be differentiated by the characters that define the genus: presence of a well-developed petiolar scale and mandibular dentition which presents teeth alternating with denticles (Wild 2007b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%