2017
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4766e2017005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic groups with lower movement capacity may present higher beta diversity

Abstract: ABSTRACT. Diversity analysis by partition is an approach employed in order to understand how communities spatially structure themselves and the factors that operate in the generation and maintenance of distribution patterns. We examined the spatial structure of species diversity of four taxonomic groups, with diff erent dispersal abilities, in 16 forest fragments in the southern region of the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil. Specifi cally, we tested: i) if the similarity in species composition would be negativel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(95 reference statements)
0
0
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our search for works published between 1968 and April 2018 considering Hyla prasina, Hypsiboas prasinus, or Boana prasina as a valid name recovered 93 references that met the criteria of Article 23.9.1.2 of the Code (Beçak 1968;Lutz 1973;Lynch 1979;Haddad & Pombal 1987;Heyer et al 1988Heyer et al , 1990Martins & Haddad 1988;Reynolds & Foster 1992;Baldissera et al 1993;Duellman et al 1997;Pombal 1997Pombal , 2010Bertoluci 1998;Giaretta et al 1999;Machado et al 1999;Amaral et al 2000;Bernarde & Machado 2001;Kwet & Miranda 2001;Bertoluci & Rodrigues 2002;Eterovick et al 2002Eterovick et al , 2005Machado & Bernarde 2002;Garcia et al 2003Garcia et al , 2007Garcia et al , 2008Faivovich et al 2004Faivovich et al , 2005Gomes et al 2004;Jim 2004;Rocha et al 2004 Pinheiro et al 2016;Guerra-Fuentes et al 2017;Kindermann et al 2017;Köhler et al 2017;Moretti et al 2017;Silva et al 2017;Taboada et al 2017;Dorigo et al 2018). This long list clearly shows that Hyla prasina Burmeister, 1856 is a widely used name (mostly under the combination Hypsiboas prasinus, now Boana prasina), contrary to the statement by Ohler & Dubois (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our search for works published between 1968 and April 2018 considering Hyla prasina, Hypsiboas prasinus, or Boana prasina as a valid name recovered 93 references that met the criteria of Article 23.9.1.2 of the Code (Beçak 1968;Lutz 1973;Lynch 1979;Haddad & Pombal 1987;Heyer et al 1988Heyer et al , 1990Martins & Haddad 1988;Reynolds & Foster 1992;Baldissera et al 1993;Duellman et al 1997;Pombal 1997Pombal , 2010Bertoluci 1998;Giaretta et al 1999;Machado et al 1999;Amaral et al 2000;Bernarde & Machado 2001;Kwet & Miranda 2001;Bertoluci & Rodrigues 2002;Eterovick et al 2002Eterovick et al , 2005Machado & Bernarde 2002;Garcia et al 2003Garcia et al , 2007Garcia et al , 2008Faivovich et al 2004Faivovich et al , 2005Gomes et al 2004;Jim 2004;Rocha et al 2004 Pinheiro et al 2016;Guerra-Fuentes et al 2017;Kindermann et al 2017;Köhler et al 2017;Moretti et al 2017;Silva et al 2017;Taboada et al 2017;Dorigo et al 2018). This long list clearly shows that Hyla prasina Burmeister, 1856 is a widely used name (mostly under the combination Hypsiboas prasinus, now Boana prasina), contrary to the statement by Ohler & Dubois (2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No presente estudo realizou-se uma revisão bibliográfica e verificou-se que, após a descrição original, Scinax crospedospilus foi sendo paulatinamente registrado em diversas localidades na Mata Atlântica dos estados do Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo e Minas Gerais (Araujo et al, 2010;Araujo et al, 2013;Assis & Feio, 2017;Bang et al, 2017;Bertoluci, 1998;Bertoluci & Rodrigues, 2002;Bevier et al, 2008;Brusquetti et al, 2014;Carvalho et al 2008;Cochran, 1955;Condez et al, 2009;Conte et al, 2016;Forlani et al, 2010;Garcia et al, 2012;Garey et al, 2014;Gruber et al, 2017;Heyer et al, 1990;Lacerda et al, 2014;Leite et al, 2019;Lourenço-de-Moraes et al, 2018;Lutz, 1973;Lyra et al, 2017;Magrini et al, 2011;Moroti et al, 2019aMoroti et al, , 2019bMoura et al, 2012;Neves et al, 2017a;Neves et al, 2017b;Pacheco et al, 2016;Pereira et al, 2016;Pires & Feio, 2017;Pugliese et al, 2004;Silva et al, 2011;Silva et al, 2016;Silva et al, 2017;Silva et al, 2018;Silveira et al, 2019;Souza et al, 2016;Verdade et al, 2009). Em Minas Gerais, Lutz (1973)...…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Em Minas Gerais, Lutz (1973) mencionou a ocorrência da espécie na parte mineira do Parque Nacional de Itatiaia, em Bocaina de Minas, e também em Rio Pomba ("agricultural station of Pomba"). Em seguida, S. crospedospilus foi registrado em Fervedouro (Moura et al, 2012;Silva et al, 2018), Viçosa (Lacerda et al, 2014;Pires & Feio, 2017;Silva et al, 2011), Itamonte (Conte et al, 2016), Juiz de Fora (Neves et al, 2017a;Pacheco et al, 2016;Silva et al, 2018), Barão do Monte Alto (Pereira et al, 2016;Pereira et al, 2020), Muriaé (Souza et al, 2016), Passa Quatro (Silva et al, 2016), Santa Rita de Jacutinga (Silva et al, 2016), Cataguazes (Assis & Feio, 2017;Silva et al, 2018), Chiador (Bang et al, 2017), Rio Preto (Neves et al, 2017b), Santa Bárbara do Monte Verde (Neves et al, 2017b), Araponga, Astolfo Dutra, Caratinga, Coronel Pacheco, Divino, Eugenópolis, Itanhandu, Muriaé, Piedade de Caratinga, Santa Bárbara do Leste, Santa Margarida, Santana do Deserto, Santos Dumont e São Francisco do Glória (Silva et al, 2018). Mais recentemente, S. crospedospilus foi reportado para algumas localidades em Mariana (Silveira et al, 2019) e na adjacência da Serra Azul em Brumadinho (Leite et al, 2019), na região do Quadrilátero Ferrífero.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified