2020
DOI: 10.1111/1749-4877.12472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic databases should reflect, and not substitute, published scientific literature and community consensus: some observations on WoRMS and barnacles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As somewhat anticipated by Collareta et al . ( 2020 ), we mostly disagree with such an arrangement of the coronuloids, which proposes drastic changes that should also be properly substantiated by extensive morphological observations on extant and extinct forms. Thus, while acknowledging the impressive amount of results and interpretations provided by Chan et al .…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…As somewhat anticipated by Collareta et al . ( 2020 ), we mostly disagree with such an arrangement of the coronuloids, which proposes drastic changes that should also be properly substantiated by extensive morphological observations on extant and extinct forms. Thus, while acknowledging the impressive amount of results and interpretations provided by Chan et al .…”
Section: Methodscontrasting
confidence: 64%
“…I acknowledge that universal or even widespread consensus on taxonomic issues is not always achievable. Collareta et al (2020) have put the wider issue succinctly: '… while widespread scientific consensus may often be hard to reach, the search for it can neither be sidetracked nor limited to a relatively small group of researchers. '…”
Section: Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Editorial Note: “This response to Collareta et al . (2020) was reviewed by several taxonomists, all who expressed a degree of misgiving about the editorial processes and protocols involved in the revision of the Thoracica and publication of this revision in WoRMS. It is critical that future editors ensure that any taxonomic revision is supported by peer‐reviewed publication.”…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We write this plea for direct contact with the WoRMS team in response to a letter published in July 2020 in Integrative Zoology (Collareta et al . 2020) highlighting the issue of unsupported taxonomic changes in WoRMS. In February 2020, a number of changes were made to the higher taxonomy of the thoracican barnacles within WoRMS which were not backed up by a published, citable source, an erroneous action, not in line with the WoRMS best practice guidelines (Horton et al .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%