2018
DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.28.20887
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic annotation of public fungal ITS sequences from the built environment – a report from an April 10–11, 2017 workshop (Aberdeen, UK)

Abstract: Recent DNA-based studies have shown that the built environment is surprisingly rich in fungi. These indoor fungi – whether transient visitors or more persistent residents – may hold clues to the rising levels of human allergies and other medical and building-related health problems observed globally. The taxonomic identity of these fungi is crucial in such pursuits. Molecular identification of the built mycobiome is no trivial undertaking, however, given the large number of unidentified, misidentified, and tec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

4
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
26
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In guise of a conclusion, we would like to translate our experience into a number of recommendations for good practice, several of which are repeating recent conclusions on the taxonomic annotation of public fungal ITS sequences from the built environment (Nilsson et al 2018). Nearly all of these recommendations are specifically addressing fungal taxonomists:…”
Section: Recommendations For Fungal Taxonomistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In guise of a conclusion, we would like to translate our experience into a number of recommendations for good practice, several of which are repeating recent conclusions on the taxonomic annotation of public fungal ITS sequences from the built environment (Nilsson et al 2018). Nearly all of these recommendations are specifically addressing fungal taxonomists:…”
Section: Recommendations For Fungal Taxonomistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The taxonomy of representative 16S rRNA gene sequences was determined using Python Nearest Alignment Space Termination (PyNAST) with the Greengenes 13_8 database as the reference, and multiple alignments of representative sequences were performed using PyNAST (Al-Hebshi et al, 2015). The taxonomy of representative ITS sequences was determined using the UNITE database (Nilsson et al, 2018). Representative 16S rRNA gene or ITS1 sequences were classified into specific taxa using the Ribosome Database Project (RDP) classifier (Whelan and Surette, 2017).…”
Section: Sequence Processing and Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA metabarcoding has become a commonly used tool because it provides an estimate of biodiversity, including that of taxa that cannot be cultured, and identification relies on relatively stable genetic information rather than often variable and subtle phenotypic characters. Limitations of the method include the fact that marker regions and PCR primers must be selected a priori to detect the taxa of interest and that the variability of the marker region, and how well the taxa are represented within a given reference database, determines the success of the identification of the members of an assemblage (Nilsson et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%