1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00017483
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic and nomenclatural revision of Sl�de?ek's list of ciliates (Protozoa: Ciliophora) as indicators of water quality

Abstract: A taxonomic and nomenclatural revision of Sladecek's et al. (1981) and Wegl's (1983) lists of ciliates (Protozoa : Ciliophora) as indicators of water quality has been performed . The original reference, important synonyms, and modern taxonomic literature are provided for each of the 378 taxa recognized . The results of this revision are summarized in a table which shows the correct (modern) name, author, and date of publication of each species as well as its saprobity, its saprobic valency, its indicative weig… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
40
0
2

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 113 publications
3
40
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The ciliates abundance and diversity have been used as a water quality indicator and ecosystems dynamics (FOISSNER, 1988). Heterotrophic ciliates feed on microorganisms in aquatic ecosystems and they are important in the energy flow (SHERR; SHERR, 1988;DECAMP et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ciliates abundance and diversity have been used as a water quality indicator and ecosystems dynamics (FOISSNER, 1988). Heterotrophic ciliates feed on microorganisms in aquatic ecosystems and they are important in the energy flow (SHERR; SHERR, 1988;DECAMP et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each sample of biofilm was counted in three replicates of 0.05 ml each. Ciliates were identified following Curds (1982), Curds et al (1983) and Foissner (1988).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The abundance of ciliates was expressed in number of cells per cm 2 as ratio between the volume (ml) collected at each station, and the total amount of sampled area (cm 2 ). Saprobic evaluations were made using the saprobic values given by Foissner (1988) and Foissner et al (1995).…”
Section: Sampling and Enumeration Of Protozoamentioning
confidence: 99%