2019
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00697
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxonomic and Functional Characterization of the Microbial Community During Spontaneous in vitro Fermentation of Riesling Must

Abstract: Although there is an extensive tradition of research into the microbes that underlie the winemaking process, much remains to be learnt. We combined the high-throughput sequencing (HTS) tools of metabarcoding and metagenomics, to characterize how microbial communities of Riesling musts sampled at four different vineyards, and their subsequent spontaneously fermented derivatives, vary. We specifically explored community variation relating to three points: (i) how microbial communities vary by vineyard; (ii) how … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
19
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
2
19
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A Qubit Fluorometer (Invitrogen) was used to quantify DNA in each extract. Preparation of sequencing libraries was carried out using the Blunt‐End Single Tube (BEST) protocol (as described in Carøe et al., 2018; Mak et al., 2017) or the Blunt End Multi Tube (BEMT) protocol (described in Sirén et al., 2019) with double‐indexing with matching indices to account for potential carryover between libraries on the flow cell (Kircher, Sawyer, & Meyer, 2012; Sinha, Stanley, Gulati, Ezran, & Travaglini, 2017). Libraries were pooled in equimolar concentrations aiming at ca.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Qubit Fluorometer (Invitrogen) was used to quantify DNA in each extract. Preparation of sequencing libraries was carried out using the Blunt‐End Single Tube (BEST) protocol (as described in Carøe et al., 2018; Mak et al., 2017) or the Blunt End Multi Tube (BEMT) protocol (described in Sirén et al., 2019) with double‐indexing with matching indices to account for potential carryover between libraries on the flow cell (Kircher, Sawyer, & Meyer, 2012; Sinha, Stanley, Gulati, Ezran, & Travaglini, 2017). Libraries were pooled in equimolar concentrations aiming at ca.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the use of high-throughput sequencing (HTS) techniques could provide a more realistic view of the complex microbial community present during wine aging. These techniques have been recently used in wine samples mostly focusing on grapes, grape must, or fermentation stages ( Bokulich et al, 2014 , 2015 , 2016 ; Piao et al, 2015 ; Pinto et al, 2015 ; Marzano et al, 2016 ; Salvetti et al, 2016 ; Lleixà et al, 2018 ; Mezzasalma et al, 2018 ; Gao et al, 2019 ; Sirén et al, 2019 ). However, little attention has been paid to changes of microbial communities during wine aging process or factors driving its evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The widest part of these dealt with bacterial diversity on grapevines (Table 1) [32,34,40,41,43,44]. Some studies followed the evolution of bacterial communities up to the end of alcoholic fermentation [35,36,37,42,45]. Few works investigated the prokaryotic microbiota, associated with malolactic fermentation of wine [33,38,39] using NGS analysis, the biotechnological phase of the major positive impact of bacteria on wine quality [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%