2008
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TaxonGap: a visualization tool for intra- and inter-species variation among individual biomarkers

Abstract: Graphical User Interface; Executable JAVA archive file, source code, supplementary information and sample files can be downloaded from the website: http://www.kermit.ugent.be/taxongap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
55
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, this gene combination recognised all 34 Russula species. This conclusion was also supported by the analysis using TaxonGap (Slabbinck et al 2008) and SpeciesIdentifier in TaxonDNA (Meier et al 2006), as shown in Table 2. Second, the PCR amplification and sequencing success rates were relatively higher in ITS and rpb2 (88.1% in Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, this gene combination recognised all 34 Russula species. This conclusion was also supported by the analysis using TaxonGap (Slabbinck et al 2008) and SpeciesIdentifier in TaxonDNA (Meier et al 2006), as shown in Table 2. Second, the PCR amplification and sequencing success rates were relatively higher in ITS and rpb2 (88.1% in Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Similarity matrices were calculated using the MegAlign program in DNAStar v7.1 (Lasergene, WI, USA) and the resulting output was analysed and visualised in TaxonGap 2.4.1 (Slabbinck et al 2008). The intra-and inter-specific pairwise distances were analysed in MEGA 7.0.26 with Kimura's two-parameter (K2P) model (Kumar et al 2016) and SpeciesIdentifier 1.8 in TaxonDNA (Meier et al 2006).…”
Section: Comparison Of Intra-and Inter-specific Divergencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A partition homogeneity test (PHT) was performed with 1000 replicates in PAUP 4.0b10 [41] to evaluate statistical congruence between sequence data from EF-1α and RPB2 gene regions. The aligned sequences of each gene and the combined EF-1α and RPB2 genes were analyzed using DNAstar 7.1.0 (Lasergene, USA) to calculate the similarity matrices and then illustrate the intra-and inter-specific variations of the candidate barcode loci for each of the 19 species tested in this study, using a visualization analysis tool, TaxonGap 2.4.1 [42]. As suggested by Martens et al [43], Nectria pseudotrichia was designated as the outgroup in the analysis.…”
Section: Comparison Of Intra-and Inter-specific Divergencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The successful species identification of a DNA barcode requires a clear distinction between intra-and inter-specific divergences [47]. The intraand inter-specific variations of the candidate DNA barcode regions for each of the 19 Neonectria species generated using TaxonGap [42] indicated that the EF-1α gene provided a somewhat better resolution compared with the ITS, β-tubulin, and RPB2 genes (Figure 1). For the EF-1α gene, the smallest inter-specific variation was 1.7%, which is shown as a thin and black line in Figure 1.…”
Section: Selection Of Dna Barcode Markers For Neonectriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TaxonGap analysis (Slabbinck et al, 2008) was performed on type strains representing the different subgroups of the Pseudomonas fluorescens group. TaxonGap allows visual comparison of the discriminatory power of different biomarkers to differentiate a set of operational taxonomic units (OTUs), but also for their abilities to differentiate members constituting an OTU.…”
Section: Selection Of the Rpod Gene To Differentiate Pseudomonasmentioning
confidence: 99%