2017
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxon abundance, diversity, co-occurrence and network analysis of the ruminal microbiota in response to dietary changes in dairy cows

Abstract: The ruminal microbiome, comprising large numbers of bacteria, ciliate protozoa, archaea and fungi, responds to diet and dietary additives in a complex way. The aim of this study was to investigate the benefits of increasing the depth of the community analysis in describing and explaining responses to dietary changes. Quantitative PCR, ssu rRNA amplicon based taxa composition, diversity and co-occurrence network analyses were applied to ruminal digesta samples obtained from four multiparous Nordic Red dairy cow… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
79
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
11
79
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The common rumen bacteria Prevotella ruminicola, P. brevis, P. bryantii and P. albensis tended to be more abundant in high-concentrate diets, and Fibrobacter abundance was higher in forage-fed cattle (Henderson et al, 2015). In addition, higher microbial diversity is also observed in forage diets as compared to highconcentrate diets (Tapio et al, 2017), a finding that likely reflects the greater complexity of carbohydrates and possibly functional conditions (i.e., pH, rate of passage, osmolality) in ruminants fed forage-based diets.…”
Section: Composition Of the Rumen Microbiomementioning
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The common rumen bacteria Prevotella ruminicola, P. brevis, P. bryantii and P. albensis tended to be more abundant in high-concentrate diets, and Fibrobacter abundance was higher in forage-fed cattle (Henderson et al, 2015). In addition, higher microbial diversity is also observed in forage diets as compared to highconcentrate diets (Tapio et al, 2017), a finding that likely reflects the greater complexity of carbohydrates and possibly functional conditions (i.e., pH, rate of passage, osmolality) in ruminants fed forage-based diets.…”
Section: Composition Of the Rumen Microbiomementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Recent metatranscriptomic analysis of the rumen contents of cattle fed a 50:50 forage:concentrate TMR supports the pivotal role of these well-characterized fibrolytic bacteria (Prevotella, Ruminoccocus and Fibrobacter) in fibre degradation (Comtet-Marre et al, 2017). Several studies have also found low levels of these well-known cellulolytic bacteria in cattle fed a high-forage diet (Creevey et al, 2014;Tapio et al, 2017). Interestingly, Tapio et al (2017) observed that increased forage content resulted in an increase the abundance of many uncharacterized bacteria within the Clostridiaceae and Lachnospiraceae families.…”
Section: Impact Of Forage On the Rumen Microbiomementioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Metagenomic studies have explored a number of environments, including cow rumen (Li et al, 2017;Tapio et al, 2017), human intestinal tract (Qin et al, 2010) and oral cavity (Dewhirst et al, 2010), marine (Venter et al, 2004), freshwater (Roux et al, 2012), soil (De Angelis et al, 2010), and air . The sequencing of 16S rRNA gene is the most efficient approach to assess the phylogeny and diversity of a community, especially if the studied environment contains a large fraction of uncharacterized microorganisms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%