2021
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3819540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxing Property in Developing Countries: Theory and Evidence from Mexico

Abstract: NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Work in low-and middle-income countries has largely revealed similar results (Ortega and Scartascini 2020;Brockmeyer et al 2019;Kettle et al 2016;Brockmeyer et al 2020), again with results not always significant (Del Carmen, Espinal Hernandez, and Scot 2020). Evidence from Rwanda suggests that less aggressive messages (such as reciprocity or reminder-framed messages) work slightly better than those aimed at deterrence (Mascagni, Nell, and Monkam 2017), whereas evidence from Uganda suggests stronger impacts for enforcement focused messages (Cohen 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Work in low-and middle-income countries has largely revealed similar results (Ortega and Scartascini 2020;Brockmeyer et al 2019;Kettle et al 2016;Brockmeyer et al 2020), again with results not always significant (Del Carmen, Espinal Hernandez, and Scot 2020). Evidence from Rwanda suggests that less aggressive messages (such as reciprocity or reminder-framed messages) work slightly better than those aimed at deterrence (Mascagni, Nell, and Monkam 2017), whereas evidence from Uganda suggests stronger impacts for enforcement focused messages (Cohen 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Most governments in developing economies, such as Ghana and Nigeria, temporarily reduced income tax rates, cut indirect taxes, and extended the deadline for ling tax returns to ease the tax burden during the pandemic. Furthermore, certain tax types were temporarily eliminated (VAT and import duties on pharmaceutical products and equipment, and food waived for the treatment and containment of COVID-19, Brockmeyer et al 2022). A study by the IMF (2021) shows that predicting tax revenue in a pandemic such as the current COVID-19 is thought-provoking.…”
Section: The Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To analyze the tax planning response, we now consider how tax professionals may impact the effects of monitoring reforms. We assume that the economy is populated by a continuum of firms i, which can either have in-house accountants, denoted by I, or consult with a specialized firm, denoted by C. As in Brockmeyer et al (2021), we model this decision as a discrete choice.…”
Section: Tax Monitoring and Tax Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, our paper adds more broadly to the literature on tax capacity in developing countries; see Pomeranz and Vila-Belda (2019) for a recent review. Significant attention has been devoted to the taxation of small and medium size firms (see, e.g., Best et al, 2015;Mittal and Mahajan, 2017;Okunogbe and Pouliquen, 2018;Brockmeyer et al, 2019;Waseem, 2018;Jensen, 2019;Basri et al, 2019;Weigel, 2020) and to property taxes (see, e.g., Okunogbe, 2019;Brockmeyer et al, 2021;Balan et al, 2020;Bergeron et al, 2020). Due mostly to data constraints and the lack of exogenous variation, with the notable exception of Holz et al (2020) and Carrillo et al (2021), few papers so far have been able to analyze large corporations, even though large corporations represent a highly disproportionate share of total tax revenue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%