2005
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.842024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taxes, Leverage, and the Cost of Equity Capital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

32
159
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(193 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
32
159
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are consistent with Predictions 2 and 3. In contrast, while Dhaliwal et al (2005) find evidence that interest deductibility reduces the cost of capital (consistent with Prediction 2), tax rate on capital gains relative to the rate on dividends and interest, it would reduce the implicit tax rate on capital gains even further. (On the other hand, their calculations ignore the high turnover frequently observed for common stocks and mutual funds, which increases the effective tax rate on equity.)…”
Section: Empirical Evidence On Whether Personal Taxes Affectmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…These results are consistent with Predictions 2 and 3. In contrast, while Dhaliwal et al (2005) find evidence that interest deductibility reduces the cost of capital (consistent with Prediction 2), tax rate on capital gains relative to the rate on dividends and interest, it would reduce the implicit tax rate on capital gains even further. (On the other hand, their calculations ignore the high turnover frequently observed for common stocks and mutual funds, which increases the effective tax rate on equity.)…”
Section: Empirical Evidence On Whether Personal Taxes Affectmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The Pearson correlation is highest between r gm and r peg at 0.589, and lowest between r gls and r peg at 0.059. As pointed out in Dhaliwal, Heitzman and Li (2006), while all four measures have been used in previous studies as estimates of firm's cost of equity, there appears to be considerable variation in the magnitude of the associations between these variables and individual risk proxies. There is so far no consensus as to which measure is superior as proxy for cost of equity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, instead of using cost of equity derived from Value-Line price target projection, I follow Dhaliwal, Heitzman and Li (2006) and construct four different implied cost of equity measures introduced, respectively, by Gebhardt, Lee, and Swaminathan (2001), Claus and Thomas (2001), Gode and Mohanram (2003), and Easton (2004).…”
Section: Signed: ____________________mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of our replication are reported in Table 5 We then examine changes in the cost of equity capital for converting firms relative to non-converting firms. We estimate the cost of equity as a function of changes in conformity, and a set of controls following Dhaliwal et al (2006). We estimate the following model:…”
Section: Btc (Link 1) > Earnings Informativeness (Link 2) > Cost Of Cmentioning
confidence: 99%