Tax-funded digital government communication in Austria: Members of the government on Facebook

Abstract

For a few years now, members of the government in Austria have been using Facebook to reach out to the public as well as to the mass media. Following normative guidelines and regulations, tax-funded government communication should be neutral, informative and autonomous of party politics. Using a multi-method approach, combining a structural analysis of formal criteria of Facebook accounts and an automated quantitative content analysis of Facebook postings, we investigated to what extent the official Facebook accounts of members of the last two Austrian governments were an exclusive tool for digital government communication. We found that not all representatives made use of Facebook. Moreover, tax-funded digital government communication on Facebook was not all neutral and autonomous of party politics. Based on our findings, we conclude that there is a lack of regulatory framework in Austria to govern taxfunded use of social media.

A Informação Digital sobre Resíduos Sólidos como Ferramenta de Comunicação Governamental ## Digital Information on Solid Waste as a Government Communication Tool

“…Portanto, para ser eficaz, a comunicação governamental deve ser neutra, informativa e autônoma da política partidária (Russmann et al, 2020), além de envolver todas as instâncias governamentais de forma a garantir que se estabeleça um processo comunicativo de interesse da sociedade civil (Kunsch, 2012;Silveira, 2014). No entanto, fica claro que geralmente se refere a um mecanismo de gestão pública que ajuda os atores estatais a ganhar legitimidade do governo perante a sociedade (Gil & Matos, 2012).…”

“…A comunicação governamental está inserida nesse contexto e busca agilidade no fluxo das informações geradas com relação à tomada de decisão pública (Cezar et al, 2013). Portanto, cabe destacar que a comunicação governamental pode ocorrer de diversas formas, ou seja, por meio da mídia disponibilizada pelo governo em veículos regionais, programas de rádio e televisão, entre secretarias e órgãos governamentais, por meio das páginas eletrônicas das secretarias estaduais e municipais, outras (Russmann et al, 2020).…”

Claiming Authority Over ‘Truths’ and ‘Facts’: Information Risk Campaigns to Prevent Irregular Migration

“…Initially, social media communication promised to affirm such principles and increase civic and social participation (Dahlgren, 2013) and today's governments and international organisations have become avid users of social media. However, demands for transparency have become more poignant (DePaula et al, 2018), and the reality of governments' social media communication is more complex: research suggests that it pursues rather symbolic and representational purposes instead of interactivity and participation, and blurs the lines between information and political party interests (DePaula et al, 2018;Russmann et al, 2020;Zavattaro & Sementelli, 2014).…”

Government Internet-based Communication in Times of COVID-19: the Perspective of University Students from Slovakia and Ukraine

“…In particular, the academic literature highlights how government officials use the Internet and social media to communicate with the public. Scholars (Agerdal-Hjermind, Valentini, 2015;Amadeo, 2016;Graham, Avery, 2013;Haro-de-Rosario et al, 2018;Russmann et al, 2020) state that social media are highly regarded as a beneficial communication tool for local governments. Despite the fact that social networks, as media researchers (Levitskaya, Fedorov, 2020: 71) emphasize, are becoming sources of various kinds of fakes, today many local governments have adopted social platforms as part of their communication strategy.…”