2000
DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1999.1093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tax Deductions, Environmental Policy, and the “Double Dividend” Hypothesis

Abstract: Recent stGies find that envirormerital tax swaps Environm ental Policy, typical!y exacerhjat;e th-e cosEs and the "Double Dividend" oftorax sysrem rind therefore do not produc-H ypothesis "doubtl e dividend. This raper extends orevioujr mocels by incorporating tax-favorec' Ian Parry consumrrptionc goods. In tani Antonio Bento setting, .he efmiciency gains from ,-ec\!cng environonerren2a tax revenues are larger because preexisting ta,xer distoirt Lhe cons'"\i-p, ion burnde, in oadition to factoc rarke,. A genui… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 158 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To pick just one example, Parry and Bento (2000) suggest that inefficient tax preferences within the income tax system (tax deductions, credits, and exemptions that are not justified by market failures) narrow the tax base of the income tax, and that taking this into account means that environmental taxes are more efficient at raising revenue than the income tax -and thus that the optimal environmental tax is more than marginal damage. A major problem with that argument is that it compares the existing (inefficiently designed) income tax to an efficiently designed environmental tax.…”
Section: Environmental Taxes As Part Of the Broader Tax Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To pick just one example, Parry and Bento (2000) suggest that inefficient tax preferences within the income tax system (tax deductions, credits, and exemptions that are not justified by market failures) narrow the tax base of the income tax, and that taking this into account means that environmental taxes are more efficient at raising revenue than the income tax -and thus that the optimal environmental tax is more than marginal damage. A major problem with that argument is that it compares the existing (inefficiently designed) income tax to an efficiently designed environmental tax.…”
Section: Environmental Taxes As Part Of the Broader Tax Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Roughly, the last two forms can be classified as the strong version that implies that environmental taxes will generate environmental benefits at a zero or negative cost to the economy. While the weak form has generally been supported by both theoretical and empirical work, the strong version is questioned in many studies [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: The Double Dividend From Environmental Taxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, according to Parry and Bento (2000), a revenue-neutral CO 2 tax of $10-$20 could create efficiency gains for society of about $20-$30 billion per year under certain modeling assumptions. The efficiency gains could vary depending on assumptions about the marginal excess burden of income taxes.…”
Section: Indirect Benefits Of Auctions and Taxesmentioning
confidence: 99%