Tax avoidance and firm risk: evidence from China

Abstract

Prior literature documents puzzling evidence revealing that tax avoidance activities do not affect firm‐specific risk. Using an extended US sample, we find that lower cash effective tax rates (ETRs) are associated with higher future return volatility, supporting the traditional view of tax risk–return trade‐off. In sharp contrast to the US evidence, our analysis of Chinese firms suggests that Chinese state‐owned enterprises (SOEs) with lower cash and GAAP ETRs tend to have lower future risk. In addition, we adopt a difference‐in‐differences approach based on the variations generated by two exogenous, anti‐tax avoidance regulations in China but find no evidence suggesting a causal relationship between tax avoidance and firm risk. Overall, our results suggest that the relationship between tax avoidance and risk varies across countries, sample periods and tax aggressiveness measures, and we highlight the importance of addressing the endogenous nature in future research.

The impact of low-carbon policy on green manufacturing development

“…38–43 Second, including low-carbon policies in the local governments’ assessment mechanism, would guarantee the sustainability of pollutant emissions reductions. Although China is characterized as an economy with significant influences on central and local governments via state ownership and regulation, 44–49 the findings in this paper show that low-carbon city initiatives have weakened the ‘GDP-only’ evaluation mechanism and promote carbon emissions reduction, which is evident among not only state-owned enterprises but also private industrial enterprises. Therefore, to ensure the sustainability of low-carbon policies, efforts should be made to develop a long-term and dynamic system for carbon emissions reduction.…”

Founder or descendant CEOs, tax avoidance and firms' future risks: the Indonesian evidence

“…This study also include industry and year dummies (Rego, 2003; Guenther et al. , 2017; Cao et al. , 2021; Memon and Tauni, 2021) to control for inter-industry and inter-year variations that that may affect our results.…”

“…Using firms from two countries (the USA and China), Cao et al (2021) observe that USA firms' future stock return volatility increases when they avoid taxes more. However, Chinese firms that avoid taxes more exhibit lower future risks.…”

Profit Shifting, Employee Pay, and Inequalities: Evidence from US-Listed Companies

“…Numerous papers identify the techniques of profit shifting, but only a fistful of papers investigate the consequences of profit shifting. They look at its repercussions for firm value (Desai and Dharmapala, 2009;Blaufus, Möhlmann, and Schwäbe, 2019;Hasan, Lobo, and Qiu, 2021), risk (Cao, Feng, Lu, and Shan, 2021), investments (Overesch, 2009;Goldbach, Nagengast, Steinmüller, and Wamser, 2019), innovation (Li, Ma, and Shevlin, 2021), industry concentration (Martin, Parenti, and Toubal, 2022), and macroeconomic statistics (Guvenen, Mataloni, Rassier, and Ruhl, 2017;Bricongne, Delpeuch, and Forero, 2021). The closest paper in this stream of research is the one of Krautheim and Schmidt-Eisenlohr (2016).…”