2020
DOI: 10.1155/2020/2582938
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TAVR: A Review of Current Practices and Considerations in Low-Risk Patients

Abstract: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an established treatment for severe, symptomatic, aortic stenosis (AS) in patients of all risk categories and now comprises 12.5% of all aortic valve replacements. TAVR is a less invasive alternative to traditional surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), with equivalent or superior outcomes. The use of TAVR has increased rapidly. The success and increase in use of TAVR are a result of advances in technology, greater operator experience, and improved outcomes. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, improvement of the quality of pre-interventional analysis, physicians experience and development of newer generation devices have mitigated some of these clinical complications and enhanced its performance in patients with various pre-operative risks. The high prevalence of BAV in younger aortic stenosis patients, coupled with the worldwide expansion of TAVR use among younger and lower surgical-risk patients, including BAV patients [6][7][8][9][10], establishes a compelling need for strategies to avoid procedural complications, which appears to be frequent in this subgroup of patients. After being used as an off-label treatment option for a long time, TAVR was recently being approved for BAV patient population by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Conformity [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, improvement of the quality of pre-interventional analysis, physicians experience and development of newer generation devices have mitigated some of these clinical complications and enhanced its performance in patients with various pre-operative risks. The high prevalence of BAV in younger aortic stenosis patients, coupled with the worldwide expansion of TAVR use among younger and lower surgical-risk patients, including BAV patients [6][7][8][9][10], establishes a compelling need for strategies to avoid procedural complications, which appears to be frequent in this subgroup of patients. After being used as an off-label treatment option for a long time, TAVR was recently being approved for BAV patient population by the US Food and Drug Administration and European Conformity [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, TAVI candidates were recruited among patients thought to have a prohibitively high surgical risk. We are witnessing a paradigm shift as the proportion of patients treated with TAVI is increasing worldwide and increas- ingly lower risk patients are being recruited (12,13,14). Surgery, however, remains the standard of care, as it offers reproducible long-term results and is much less likely to be associated with paravalvular leaks, new onset third degree AV block and vascular access related complications; all of which burden TAVI (15).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an established treatment for high-risk patients which are not eligible for surgery. Recently, guidelines were updated and TAVI was introduced as a possible treatment for a larger population which include intermediate-risk patients (4)(5)(6)(7). TAVI demonstrated significant survival benefit in the short-term follow ups across the spectrum of intermediate and high-risk patients when compared to the classical surgical valve replacement (SVR) (8,9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%