2018
DOI: 10.1090/proc/14249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tautological classes and smooth bundles over BSU(2)

Abstract: For a Lie group G and a smooth manifold W , we study the difference between smooth actions of G on W and fiber bundles over the classifying space of G with fiber W and structure group Diff(W ). In particular, we exhibit smooth manifold bundles over BSU (2) that are not induced by an action. The main tool for reaching this goal is a technical result that gives a constraint for the values of tautological classes of the fiber bundle associated to a group action.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case 𝐺 = Z and π‘Œ = 𝑆 1 , there is a continuous functor Cob Z 𝑑 β†’ Cob 𝑑 (𝑆 1 ), given by taking mapping tori: using that every smooth bundle over 𝑆 1 is induced from a diffeomorphism, this functor is in fact a levelwise equivalence. For more general groups G and π‘Œ = 𝐡𝐺, the analogous argument pertaining to G-actions and bundles over 𝐡𝐺 can fail: see [22] for a discussion of this phenomenon and counterexamples in case 𝐺 = SU (2).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case 𝐺 = Z and π‘Œ = 𝑆 1 , there is a continuous functor Cob Z 𝑑 β†’ Cob 𝑑 (𝑆 1 ), given by taking mapping tori: using that every smooth bundle over 𝑆 1 is induced from a diffeomorphism, this functor is in fact a levelwise equivalence. For more general groups G and π‘Œ = 𝐡𝐺, the analogous argument pertaining to G-actions and bundles over 𝐡𝐺 can fail: see [22] for a discussion of this phenomenon and counterexamples in case 𝐺 = SU (2).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is natural to study two related generalisations of , in an equivariant and a parametrised direction: for a (topological) group G , we can consider the G -equivariant cobordism category : objects and morphisms are, respectively, - and d -manifolds endowed with an (continuous) action of G by orientation-preserving diffeomorphisms; for a topological space Y , we can consider the Y -parametrised cobordism category : objects and morphisms are, respectively, orientable - and d -manifold bundles over Y . In the case and , there is a continuous functor , given by taking mapping tori: using that every smooth bundle over is induced from a diffeomorphism, this functor is in fact a levelwise equivalence. For more general groups G and , the analogous argument pertaining to G -actions and bundles over can fail: see [22] for a discussion of this phenomenon and counterexamples in case .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in [MT01] the authors apply the theorem towards early progress on the Mumford conjecture. Similar theorems are used in [RW08] to compute the Z/2 homology of the stable nonorientable mapping class group, as well as in [Rei19] to establish the existence of non-kinetic smooth bundles over the classifying space BSU (2). Douglas [Dou06] gave alternative proofs to [BM76] using Dold's Euclidean neighborhood rectracts.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case G = Z and Y = S 1 there is a continuous functor Cob Z d β†’ Cob d (S 1 ), given by taking mapping tori: using that every smooth bundle over S 1 is induced from a diffeomorphism, this functor is in fact a levelwise equivalence. For more general groups G and Y = BG, the analogous argument pertaining to G-actions and bundles over BG can fail: see [Rei19b] for a discussion of this phenomenon and counterexamples in case G = SU(2).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%