The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2015
DOI: 10.1007/jhep03(2015)055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tate’s algorithm for F-theory GUTs with two U(1)s

Abstract: We present a systematic study of elliptic fibrations for F-theory realizations of gauge theories with two U(1) factors. In particular, we determine a new class of SU(5) × U(1) 2 fibrations, which can be used to engineer Grand Unified Theories, with multiple, differently charged, 10 matter representations. To determine these models we apply Tate's algorithm to elliptic fibrations with two U(1) symmetries, which are realized in terms of a cubic in P 2 . In the process, we find fibers which are not characterized … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The general solution to (3.1) with relatively prime s 8 and s 9 is then given by (cf. [32]) The constraint (3.1) can also be solved simply by setting…”
Section: Unhiggsing U(1) → Su(2) In Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The general solution to (3.1) with relatively prime s 8 and s 9 is then given by (cf. [32]) The constraint (3.1) can also be solved simply by setting…”
Section: Unhiggsing U(1) → Su(2) In Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The remaining three models all give rise to the µ-term with two singlet insertions. Interesting flavor textures for these models, which have only a single 10, cannot be generated through the U (1) symmetries, however these models have the advantage of having a concrete geometric realization: none of the geometries in the literature [7][8][9][10]15] generate this particular combination of charges, however we will determine elliptic fibrations for these models in section 7.…”
Section: Two U (1) Models With Hypersurface Realizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we label our models as in [15], where the vanishing orders, n c i , are given in the order (n s 1 , n s 2 , n s 3 , n s 5 , n s 6 , n s 8 , n a 1 , n b 1 , n a 2 , n b 2 , n a 3 , n b 3 ) . (7.5) Furthermore it will be necessary to consider so-called non-canonical models, where the enhancement of the discriminant to O(z 5 ), occurs not by simply specifying the vanishing order of the coefficients, but by subtle cancellations between the coefficients, which are non-trivially related see e.g.…”
Section: Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was not surprising that F-theory benefited immensely from their efforts. Indeed, the introduction of the so-called Shioda-map to the F-theory community in [18,19] sparked the explicit construction of many abelian F-theory models [17,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. The more formal approach to U (1)s via the Mordell-Weil group not only led to new insights about physical phenomena such as gauge symmetry breaking/enhancement or the global structure of the gauge group.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%