Tatar-Chinese language interactions (based on Chinese loanwords in the speech of the Tatar diaspora living in modern China)

Nabiullina, Guzel Amirovna; Yusupova, Alfiya Shavketovna

doi:10.7813/jll.2014/5-3/40

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These few linguistic and sociolinguistic works on non-Russian languages and migration address topics of language and identity (Yusupova, Nabiullina 2016; Bedretdin 2017; Khilkhanova 2017), structural and functional features of Tatar and other languages in foreign diasporas (Akhmetova 2004;Nabiullina, Yusupova 2015;Khilkhanova 2020;Bitkeeva 2018), mechanisms and consequences of language contacts with host country languages, e.g. Chinese and English (Nabiullina, Yusupova 2014;Yusupova et. al.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

1 | 1 | 2021

2021

BES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present paper argues for a view of gender agreement without either grammatical or natural gender being represented as syntactic features. Rather than deriving declension classes in terms of realisation, I postulate them as the only relevant feature that is lexically specified on the noun. Agreement copies the declension class and triggers presuppositions. When these presuppositions clash with those already active in the discourse, default agreement is realised. The paper moreover provides a quantitative analysis of semantic correlates of declension classes and a novel analysis of SC declension classes. KeywordsDeclension class. Gender. Agreement. Properties of quantity. Serbo-Croatian. Summary 1 Introduction. -2 Declension class in terms of realisation. -3 Basics for a better model of declension classes. -4 Declension Classes, Gender and Properties of Quantity: A Quantitative Corpus-based Analysis. -5 The proposal: nouns are specified for declension classes, interpretive effects emerge in pragmatic competition. -6 The morphology of declension classes. -7 Conclusion.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

1 | 1 | 2021

2021

BES

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…A number of works by scientists of Turkic studies are devoted to the study of interaction between Chinese and Turkic languages (Baskakov, 1987;Li-qin, 2005;Nabiullina & Yusupova, 2014;Vasiliev, 1872). There are studies of Chinese in English (Sheng-li, 2013;Yang, 2009), in Russian (Kasymova & Lei, 2017;Xuehua 2019), in Buryat and Mongolian (Borisova, 2013;Dondokova, 2004).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Chinese Borrowings In The Oirat-Kalmykian Language Continuum: Animalistic And Legal Vocabulary

Omakaeva¹

2020

European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper deals with one of the most poorly studied layers of borrowed lexicon of the modern Kalmykian language -Chinese words. Modern Kalmyk language is one of the languages of Mongolian language group, one of the language successors of Oirat language. Two types of borrowed lexicon can be distinguished in it, depending on the path of its penetration: lexicon, borrowed directly, as a result of contacts of Kalmyks and their ancestors-oyrates with other peoples, as well as those lexical units that penetrated into the Kalmyk language through the recipient languages: Türkic, Ugrian, Tungus and others. Chinese borrowings penetrated into the Kalmyk language back in the period of the general history of Mongols and Kalmyks. Chinese words entered the Mongolian languages in different ways and at different times, but the main period of intensive borrowing of Chinese words can be considered the era of the Mongolian Yuan dynasty in China. Linguistic and cultural contacts between Chinese and Oirats ended when the latter migrated from Central Asia to the Northern Caspian. The list of Sino-Chinese of the Kalmykian language, previously numbering about two dozen words, has been considerably expanded. The article also attempts to determine the ways of borrowing Chinese words in the literary Kalmykian language for the first time. The comprehensive description of Sino-isms in Oirat and Kalmyk literary languages will allow to study more deeply the etymology of many lexemes of the Kalmyk language, features of phonetic adaptation of borrowings, the degree of their mastery in the recipient language.

show abstract

On the Linguistic Situation of the Tatar Diaspora in the USA

Nabiullina¹,

Yusupova²

2015

MJSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Tatar-Chinese language interactions (based on Chinese loanwords in the speech of the Tatar diaspora living in modern China)

Cited by 3 publications

References 1 publication

1 | 1 | 2021

1 | 1 | 2021

Chinese Borrowings In The Oirat-Kalmykian Language Continuum: Animalistic And Legal Vocabulary

On the Linguistic Situation of the Tatar Diaspora in the USA

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About