1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01613200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taste thresholds in patients with small-cell lung cancer

Abstract: Recognition thresholds for the four basic tastes (salt, sour, sweet and bitter) were tested by the forced-choice technique in 27 patients with small-cell lung cancer, and 22 weight-matched control patients with non-malignant diseases. No significant differences in threshold concentrations could be demonstrated. When patients who were losing weight were compared with weight-stable patients, significantly lower taste thresholds for bitter substances were found in weight losing groups in both cancer and control p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Cancer treatment therefore is aimed at killing, removing or slowing the growth of rapidly dividing cells. A pivotal review of oral sensation and cancer (Duffy et al 2002) and key papers comparing taste and smell function in cancer patients compared to healthy controls (Ovesen et al 1991;Steinbach et al 2010) support the notion that cancer in itself is not the usual cause of sensory problems in oncology populations. Instead, the clinical interventions used to combat the disease, and their subsequent side effects, are implicated in adverse changes in the sensorium and food hedonics.…”
Section: Cancer and Chemosensory Perception-implications For The Sensmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cancer treatment therefore is aimed at killing, removing or slowing the growth of rapidly dividing cells. A pivotal review of oral sensation and cancer (Duffy et al 2002) and key papers comparing taste and smell function in cancer patients compared to healthy controls (Ovesen et al 1991;Steinbach et al 2010) support the notion that cancer in itself is not the usual cause of sensory problems in oncology populations. Instead, the clinical interventions used to combat the disease, and their subsequent side effects, are implicated in adverse changes in the sensorium and food hedonics.…”
Section: Cancer and Chemosensory Perception-implications For The Sensmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In chemotherapy populations, publications have reported associations between changes in taste function to particular dietary or nutritional trends. Ovesen et al (1991) examined recognition thresholds for sweet, salt, sour and bitter in 27 patients with lung cancer and 22 weight matched control patients with non-malignant diseases and found, in all participants, that those with greater weight loss had greatest sensitivity to quinine chloride (bitter tastant). Bruera et al (1984) measured sweet sensitivity, dietary intake and nutritional status in 72 patients with advanced solid tumours receiving chemotherapy.…”
Section: The Link Between Cancer Treatment Sensory Effects and Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DeWys and Walters [8], Carson and Gormican [6], Williams and Cohen [37], Mossman and Henkin [21], Kamath et al [14] as well as Ovesen et al. [24] tested taste function in cancer patients by Henkin's drop method and reported changes in various taste modalities: sweet [6,8], sour [37], salty [6], and bitter [8]; no significant change was reported by Kamath et al [14] and Ovesen et al [24]. Other studies attempted to characterize suprathreshold intensity in cancer patients using pure taste chemicals in distilled water [1,31,33] or in simple foods [1,3,34].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taste detection and recognition thresholds of basic tastes (salt, sweet, sour and bitter) have been measured in patients with cancer using clinical [9] and electrical tests [10]. Smell changes in the absence of taste changes have been less well studied [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%