2002
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00239.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Taste Responses of Neurons in the Hamster Solitary Nucleus Are Modulated by the Central Nucleus of the Amygdala

Abstract: Previous studies have shown a modulatory influence of forebrain gustatory areas, such as the gustatory cortex and lateral hypothalamus, on the activity of taste-responsive cells in the nucleus of the solitary tract (NST). The central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA), which receives gustatory afferent information, also exerts descending control over taste neurons in the parabrachial nuclei (PbN) of the pons. The present studies were designed to investigate the role of descending amgydaloid projections to the NST i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(47 reference statements)
3
54
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall baseline activity of the 114 taste-responsive PbN neurons recorded in the present study varied from 0 to 15.80 imp/s, with a mean of 3.58 Ϯ 0.34 imp/s. This mean firing rate was similar to that recorded previously in the PbN (e.g., 3.70 Ϯ 0.27 imp/s, t ϭ 0.266, df ϭ 229, P ϭ 0.791) (34) and was significantly higher than that recorded in the NST in our previous experiments (e.g., 2.12 Ϯ 0.27 imp/s, t ϭ 3.350, df ϭ 221, P Ͻ 0.001) (36).…”
Section: Histologycontrasting
confidence: 45%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The overall baseline activity of the 114 taste-responsive PbN neurons recorded in the present study varied from 0 to 15.80 imp/s, with a mean of 3.58 Ϯ 0.34 imp/s. This mean firing rate was similar to that recorded previously in the PbN (e.g., 3.70 Ϯ 0.27 imp/s, t ϭ 0.266, df ϭ 229, P ϭ 0.791) (34) and was significantly higher than that recorded in the NST in our previous experiments (e.g., 2.12 Ϯ 0.27 imp/s, t ϭ 3.350, df ϭ 221, P Ͻ 0.001) (36).…”
Section: Histologycontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…Electrical stimulation of the BNST modulated taste responses in the NST and PbN (34,74). Activation of the CeA and LH also modulated taste responses of the neurons in the NST and PbN (8,35,36). Modulation of PbN neurons' taste responses by forebrain activation, including the CeA, LH, and GC, has also been demonstrated by Lundy and Norgren (39,40) in the rat.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Somatostatin immunoreactive neurons have been demonstrated in the central nucleus of the amygdala (CeA) (Wray and Hoffman 2007) and microinjection of retrograde tracer labels fibers that differentially distribute throughout the rostral caudal extent of the NST (Halsell 1998;Saha et al 2000). Moreover, orthodromic activation by electrical stimulation of the CeA results in modulation of the responses of rNST neurons to taste stimuli applied to the oral cavity (Li et al 2002), suggesting a role of the somatostatin fibers and the GAD67-GFP neurons in the centrifugal control of taste processing.…”
Section: Subpopulations Of Gad67-gfp Rnst Neuronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the medullary nucleus of the solitary tract (NST), electrical stimulation of the LH and CeA is known to modulate both background discharge and taste-evoked responses (Bereiter et al 1980;Cho et al 2002a;Li et al 2002;Matsuo et al 1984;Murzi et al 1986). Cortex stimulation also modulates the spontaneous activity of taste responsive cells, but the effects on sapid stimulus responsiveness have not been tested (Smith and Li 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%