1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8181(99)00021-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tasman Glacier, New Zealand: 20th-century thinning and predicted calving retreat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
145
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 132 publications
(155 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
10
145
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A glacier with debris cover evolves differently from bare ice due to the fact that thick debris cover reduces ablation (Kirkbride and Warren, 1999). For this reason, elevation differences between t 1 and t 2 are significantly smaller at the debris-covered parts and show instant increase at the place where debris cover meets bare ice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A glacier with debris cover evolves differently from bare ice due to the fact that thick debris cover reduces ablation (Kirkbride and Warren, 1999). For this reason, elevation differences between t 1 and t 2 are significantly smaller at the debris-covered parts and show instant increase at the place where debris cover meets bare ice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We expected an increase in debris cover through a redistribution of debris from higher areas of thick debris (i.e. medial moraines) to lower areas of bare ice that rapidly melt ( Kirkbride and Warren, 1999). However, the up-glacier extent of the debris cover changed little while debriscovered termini retreated between 1993 and 2009, thus reducing the debris-covered area.…”
Section: Glacier Change By Typementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can thus have a positive mass balance with a restricted accumulation area, reach lower elevation and advance when neighboring bare-ice glaciers are retreating (Scherler et al, 2011;Deline et al, 2012;Carturan et al, 2013). The increase of debris thickness toward the glacier front can also reverse the ablation gradient, which usually induces a glacier surface flattening and limits the driving stress (Kirkbride and Warren, 1999;Benn et al, 2012). Thickness variations then become more pronounced than length variations for debris-covered tongues (Benn et al, 2003;Mayer et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%