2009
DOI: 10.1002/oti.275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task‐specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice

Abstract: There is mounting evidence of the value of task-specifi c training as a neuromotor intervention in neurological rehabilitation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
279
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 356 publications
(293 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(88 reference statements)
8
279
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Task-specific motor training is an evidence-based intervention used by many therapists working in stroke rehabilitation (Hubbard, Parsons, Neilson, & Carey, 2009). Task-specific training involves repetitive practice that is 'specific' to a motor task, such as handwriting, as opposed to 'non-specific' tasks such as picking up beads.…”
Section: Synopsismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Task-specific motor training is an evidence-based intervention used by many therapists working in stroke rehabilitation (Hubbard, Parsons, Neilson, & Carey, 2009). Task-specific training involves repetitive practice that is 'specific' to a motor task, such as handwriting, as opposed to 'non-specific' tasks such as picking up beads.…”
Section: Synopsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Task-specific training involves repetitive practice that is 'specific' to a motor task, such as handwriting, as opposed to 'non-specific' tasks such as picking up beads. Practice tasks are goal-directed, meaningful (Bayona, Bitensky, Salter, & Teasell, 2005;Hubbard et al, 2009) and related to a specific task (Dobkin, 2004). Individual components of tasks are often practised, known as 'part-practice', in order to concentrate on specific movements or component skills necessary for the task (Birkenmeier, Prager, & Lang, 2010;Page, Levine, & Leonard, 2005).…”
Section: Synopsismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, traditional approaches to using automated devices often do not encourage patients to try to stand-up, thus may discourage active muscle engagement compared to clinician-assisted transfers. Clinicians' concerns regarding mechanical sit-to-stand devices arise in part from current practice paradigms that emphasize intensive, taskspecific training for promoting recovery of function and cortical reorganization following neurologic injury [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature reviews of primary topics and original research relevant to neuromotor rehabilitation in stroke are included in this issue. Hubbard et al (2009), in Task-specifi c training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice, review in detail mechanisms of and current evidence for task-specifi c training. Evidence for bilateral training is provided by Stoykov and Corcos (2009) in A review of bilateral training for upper extremity hemiparesis.…”
Section: Occupational Therapy and Neuromotor Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%