2015
DOI: 10.1017/s0263574715000466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task-space dynamics and motion/force control of fixed-base manipulators under reaction null-space-based redundancy resolution

Abstract: SUMMARYThis paper introduces a task-space dynamics formulation for fixed-base serial-link kinematically redundant manipulators and a motion/force controller based on it. The aim is to alleviate joint-space instability problems that have been observed with other motion/force controllers. The dynamics are represented in floating-base coordinates, wherein the end effector is regarded as the floating base. This representation gives rise to a momentum-conserving redundancy resolution scheme based on the reaction nu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The type of robots mentioned above has a distinct feature, that is, these robots exhibit high dynamical coupling between an actively operated part (manipulator) and a passively or actively moving part (a legged robot in this text). This coupling dynamics (Huang et al, 2015;Nenchev et al, 2016) is termed as reaction dynamics. Reaction dynamics can be used to deal with problems such as trajectory tracking or attitude adjustments of a free-floating robot (Lampariello et al, 2018;Misra and Bai 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type of robots mentioned above has a distinct feature, that is, these robots exhibit high dynamical coupling between an actively operated part (manipulator) and a passively or actively moving part (a legged robot in this text). This coupling dynamics (Huang et al, 2015;Nenchev et al, 2016) is termed as reaction dynamics. Reaction dynamics can be used to deal with problems such as trajectory tracking or attitude adjustments of a free-floating robot (Lampariello et al, 2018;Misra and Bai 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, redundancy can be used to meet user-defined tasks or additional constraints on the kinematic or dynamic control problem, such as obstacles [22,23,24] or joint-drift [25] avoidance, joint limitations [26,27,28], singularity avoidance [29,30], energy saving optimization [31,32,33], torque [34,35,36,37] and antagonistic stiffness [38] optimization, force or torque control [39,40,41,42], impact force reduction [43], collision safety evaluation [44], to name the most relevant ones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5] Various approaches to the redundancy resolution of robot manipulators have been developed and studied. [1][2][3][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] The minimum two-norm approach, which minimizes the sum of the squares of joint variables (e.g., joint velocities, joint accelerations, and joint torques), is a common solution to the redundancy-resolution problem. 1,6,7,[13][14][15][16][17] The in-depth research on robotic redundancy resolution also yields a common variation of this minimum two-norm solution, termed weighted solution, which minimizes a weighted two-norm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%