Task role motivation and attributional style as predictors of entrepreneurial performance: female sample findings

Abstract

The main thrust of this study was directed at providing empirical evidence, at the g;ender level, for a predictive model of growth-oriented entrepreneurial performance. The model focuses on: (a) the relationship between role requirements of the entrepreneurial organization and five motivational patterns that fit these roles; (b) the mediating effect of the individual's ;~ttributional style for failure and success, and hislher perception of environmental uncertainty, o n two of the five motivational patterns. The results of this study corroborate, overall, recent findings with male entrepreneurs. However, some gender differences are indicated.

Forced to Play by the Rules? Theorizing how Mixed–Sex Founding Teams Benefit Women Entrepreneurs in Male–Dominated Contexts

“…For example, a study by Masters and Meier (1988) found no significant difference in risk-taking propensity between men and women entrepreneurs. In fact, one study showed that women entrepreneurs and managers were actually more likely to take risks than their male counterparts, with the argument being that women actually have to be more willing to accept entrepreneurial risk because they face a more hostile and prejudicial work environment (Bellu, 1993). Subsequent research by Twenge (2001) found no differences in assertiveness based on the sex of the entrepreneur.…”

Determinants of new firm success

“…Others have sought for differences in entrepreneurial behaviour, defined by Chell et al (1991) as 'the striving for growth and renewal '. Miner (1993) and Bellu (1993) proposed five 'role requirements' together with five motivation patterns in their 'task role motivation theory'. And behind Smith's distinction between the 'craftsman entrepreneur' and the 'opportunistic entrepreneur' (1967) lies a complex of personality characteristics too.…”

Testing a Psychological Typology of Entrepreneurship Using Business Founders

“…Yet a rather sizable body of research has accumulated, lending considerable support to the early achievement motivation formulations (Bellu, 1988(Bellu, , 1993Bellu & Sherman, 1995;Miner, Smith, & Bracker, 1989Roberts, 1991). In addition there have been some rather positive reviews of the research on personality factors.…”