2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-015-1168-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task recognition from joint tracking data in an operational manufacturing cell

Abstract: This paper investigates the feasibility of using inexpensive, general-purpose automated methods for recognition of worker activity in manufacturing processes. A novel aspect of this study is that it is based on live data collected from an operational manufacturing cell without any guided or scripted work. Activity in a single-worker cell was recorded using the Microsoft Kinect, a commodity-priced sensor that records depth data and includes built-in functions for the detection of human skeletal positions, inclu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The problem is a reliable and systematic transfer of the qualitative human factors into requirements engineering. One could envisage the automation of the task analysis, using technology such as tracking and activity recognition (Rude et al 2018), could be performed in the future. Therefore, the identified research gap in manufacturing literature is to provide an approach to bridge the gap between task analysis and the automation system design based on the identified task functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problem is a reliable and systematic transfer of the qualitative human factors into requirements engineering. One could envisage the automation of the task analysis, using technology such as tracking and activity recognition (Rude et al 2018), could be performed in the future. Therefore, the identified research gap in manufacturing literature is to provide an approach to bridge the gap between task analysis and the automation system design based on the identified task functions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, numerical experiments are conducted on a set of synthetic data, a tool wear data set used in VOLUME 4, 2016 the 2010 Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) conference data challenge, 1 and an activity recognition data set collected using a Microsoft Kinect 2 (see [23], [24] for more information about this data set). For the experiments using a FSHMM, model parameters are estimated using ML, MAP, MAP-beta, and the VB approach outlined in [30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our approach is closest to the related model [ 22 ], but we monitor single worker activity in manufacturing, using video and we use CNN combined with classifiers: CNN + SVM and CNN + R-CNN.…”
Section: Related Work and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sharma et al [ 21 ] also used the LSTM-based, deep learning technique to obtain emotion variations, based on the data from EEG signals. Rude et al [ 22 ] investigated the feasibility of using hidden Markov models and naive Bayes K-means for recognising worker activity in manufacturing processes using the Kinect sensor. Sathyanarayana et al [ 23 ] proposed the use of a CNN to predict the relationship between physical activities and sleep patterns using accelerometer and gyroscope sensors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%