2010 International Conference on Information Society 2010
DOI: 10.1109/i-society16502.2010.6018768
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task performance in mobile and ambient interfaces. Does size matter for usability of electronic diabetes assistants?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The two screen sizes made no difference in terms of use performance and perceptions of the system. Although this interesting finding is inconsistent with those of previous studies (Chae & Kim, 2004;Findlater & McGrenere, 2008;Valdez et al, 2010), it might have resulted from the use of the touchscreen system, which is able to facilitate older adults' use of technology systems (Murata & Iwase, 2005;Ng et al, 2013), and from the system's robust usability with various screen sizes, as the system was developed in consideration of human factors (Or & Tao, 2012). The 7-inch tablet system was found to be large enough and exhibited a high level of usability for the older adults.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The two screen sizes made no difference in terms of use performance and perceptions of the system. Although this interesting finding is inconsistent with those of previous studies (Chae & Kim, 2004;Findlater & McGrenere, 2008;Valdez et al, 2010), it might have resulted from the use of the touchscreen system, which is able to facilitate older adults' use of technology systems (Murata & Iwase, 2005;Ng et al, 2013), and from the system's robust usability with various screen sizes, as the system was developed in consideration of human factors (Or & Tao, 2012). The 7-inch tablet system was found to be large enough and exhibited a high level of usability for the older adults.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%