2016
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsw054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task-irrelevant fear enhances amygdala-FFG inhibition and decreases subsequent face processing

Abstract: Facial threat is associated with changes in limbic activity as well as modifications in the cortical face-related N170. It remains unclear if task-irrelevant threat modulates the response to a subsequent facial stimulus, and whether the amygdala's role in early threat perception is independent and direct, or modulatory. In 19 participants, crowds of emotional faces were followed by target faces and a rating task while simultaneous EEG-fMRI were recorded. In addition to conventional analyses, fMRI-informed EEG … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to certain sensory unawareness findings, attentional unawareness paradigms found stronger activations in frontal and temporal areas (e.g., Holtmann et al, 2013;Vuilleumier et al, 2001) and the amygdala (e.g., Schulte Holthausen et al, 2016;Pichon et al, 2012) for unattended emotional compared to neutral faces. Additional subcortical regions including the thalamus and the striatum showed stronger activity to unattended emotional compared to neutral faces (e.g., Holtmann et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Similar to certain sensory unawareness findings, attentional unawareness paradigms found stronger activations in frontal and temporal areas (e.g., Holtmann et al, 2013;Vuilleumier et al, 2001) and the amygdala (e.g., Schulte Holthausen et al, 2016;Pichon et al, 2012) for unattended emotional compared to neutral faces. Additional subcortical regions including the thalamus and the striatum showed stronger activity to unattended emotional compared to neutral faces (e.g., Holtmann et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Anatomical connections between the amygdala and fusiform gyrus have been indicated by evaluating structural and functional connectivity in MRI studies . In a simultaneous EEG–fMRI study, task‐irrelevant fear enhanced amygdala‐fusiform gyrus inhibition and led to a reduced N170 amplitude . These prior studies support the explanation that patients with TLE exhibit functional abnormalities of the amygdala or fusiform gyrus, which result in face‐specific processing dysfunction, made evident by a reduced N170 amplitude.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation for attenuated N170 responses to emotion faces with greater CIT exposure is the inhibitory effect of amygdala activation over the fusiform gyrus (FFG), which has been demonstrated in healthy adults following fear priming (Schulte Holthausen et al, 2016). Reports of heightened amygdala activation to salient, non-threat stimuli in CIT-exposed youth and adults (Swartz et al, 2015; van Harmelen et al, 2013), and a dose–response relationship between left amygdala activation and cumulative CIT exposure (Maheu et al, 2010), suggest amygdala hyperactivation to emotion faces is likely in this sample of CIT-exposed PTSD adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%