Task errors by emergency physicians are associated with interruptions, multitasking, fatigue and working memory capacity: a prospective, direct observation study

Abstract

BackgroundInterruptions and multitasking have been demonstrated in experimental studies to reduce individuals’ task performance. These behaviours are frequently used by clinicians in high-workload, dynamic clinical environments, yet their effects have rarely been studied.ObjectiveTo assess the relative contributions of interruptions and multitasking by emergency physicians to prescribing errors.Methods36 emergency physicians were shadowed over 120 hours. All tasks, interruptions and instances of multitasking were recorded. Physicians’ working memory capacity (WMC) and preference for multitasking were assessed using the Operation Span Task (OSPAN) and Inventory of Polychronic Values. Following observation, physicians were asked about their sleep in the previous 24 hours. Prescribing errors were used as a measure of task performance. We performed multivariate analysis of prescribing error rates to determine associations with interruptions and multitasking, also considering physician seniority, age, psychometric measures, workload and sleep.ResultsPhysicians experienced 7.9 interruptions/hour. 28 clinicians were observed prescribing 239 medication orders which contained 208 prescribing errors. While prescribing, clinicians were interrupted 9.4 times/hour. Error rates increased significantly if physicians were interrupted (rate ratio (RR) 2.82; 95% CI 1.23 to 6.49) or multitasked (RR 1.86; 95% CI 1.35 to 2.56) while prescribing. Having below-average sleep showed a >15-fold increase in clinical error rate (RR 16.44; 95% CI 4.84 to 55.81). WMC was protective against errors; for every 10-point increase on the 75-point OSPAN, a 19% decrease in prescribing errors was observed. There was no effect of polychronicity, workload, physician gender or above-average sleep on error rates.ConclusionInterruptions, multitasking and poor sleep were associated with significantly increased rates of prescribing errors among emergency physicians. WMC mitigated the negative influence of these factors to an extent. These results confirm experimental findings in other fields and raise questions about the acceptability of the high rates of multitasking and interruption in clinical environments.

The Mediating Role of Psychological Capital in the Relationship Between Occupational Stress and Fatigue: A Cross-Sectional Study Among 1,104 Chinese Physicians

“…Physicians are more vulnerable to fatigue than are those in other occupational groups (8). Long-term fatigue of physicians could lead to adverse health consequences, like musculoskeletal disorders, poor mental health status, and increased error and accident at work (9,10). It means fatigue has a major impact not only on physicians' life quality and work efficiency but also on patients' safety and satisfaction with healthcare services.…”

Prescribing errors in emergency department medication history taking: will electronic medication management systems help?

“…Causes of these errors in hospital have been documented previously, including issues with general practitioner (GP) letters, 2 patients not bringing their own medications with them, 3 interruptions, multitasking and sleep deprivation. 4 ED MH commonly have errors and are often incomplete, and pharmacists have been shown to be especially suited to obtaining accurate MH in this setting. [5][6][7][8] Dean et al 9 developed a method using Reason's 10 framework to determine the cause of prescribing errors in hospital using a semistructured interview and questionnaire.…”

Thoughtless design of the electronic health record drives overuse, but purposeful design can nudge improved patient care

“…In ambulatory visits, the time pressure and tasks are slightly different, but comparably complex. In both scenarios, triaging and simultaneously managing all of the complex processes require incredible mental energy, made even more difficult by frequent interruptions 2. If every decision had to be made in an ordered, fully informed manner, we would never complete even a single patient encounter.…”