2018
DOI: 10.3758/s13415-018-0616-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task difficulty modulates brain-behavior correlations in language production and cognitive control: Behavioral and fMRI evidence from a phonological go/no-go picture-naming paradigm

Abstract: Language production and cognitive control are complex processes that involve distinct yet interacting brain networks. However, the extent to which these processes interact and their neural bases have not been thoroughly examined. Here, we investigated the neural and behavioral bases of language production and cognitive control via a phonological go/no-go picture-naming task. Naming difficulty and cognitive control demands (i.e., conflict monitoring and response inhibition) were manipulated by varying the propo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 109 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is important because it converges with evidence showing that bilinguals’ both languages are constantly coactivated, even when intending to speak one language alone, and need to be regulated even when speaking in the L1 (Costa, 2005; Kroll et al, 2006, Román et al, 2015). Importantly, recent data has reported the activation of similar domain general regions during response inhibition in a go-no-go naming task in monolinguals (Zhang et al, 2018), suggesting an active role of these areas for language control. The present results highlight the way that bilingualism may change the underlying functional network that is recruited during native language processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is important because it converges with evidence showing that bilinguals’ both languages are constantly coactivated, even when intending to speak one language alone, and need to be regulated even when speaking in the L1 (Costa, 2005; Kroll et al, 2006, Román et al, 2015). Importantly, recent data has reported the activation of similar domain general regions during response inhibition in a go-no-go naming task in monolinguals (Zhang et al, 2018), suggesting an active role of these areas for language control. The present results highlight the way that bilingualism may change the underlying functional network that is recruited during native language processing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as observed in previous studies [19,70], it seems that abstract items might be harder to process, potentially due to the high-imageability of concrete items as compared to low-imageable abstract items. It is interesting to note that some experiments show that the motor system is more involved in language processing when the processing is considered difficult [79][80][81]. Thus, the interaction that we observed may be explained by greater involvement of the motor system in the processing of abstract verbs.…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 60%
“…Studies based on lesion-symptom mapping (LSM) revealed that damage to the supramarginal gyrus and the postcentral gyrus among poststroke individuals is related to phonological deficits in single-word production [ 37 39 ]. A task-based fMRI study revealed that both regions participate in picture naming tasks among healthy individuals [ 40 ]. In general, these two areas together are thought to contribute to fluent speech production by phonetic-articulatory planning [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%