2002
DOI: 10.1177/154405910208100706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task-dependence of Activity/ Bite-force Relations and its Impact on Estimation of Chewing Force from EMG

Abstract: Estimation of chewing force from electromyograms (EMGs) calibrated in isometric biting yielded strikingly high force values. We tested the hypothesis that EMG-based force predictions are excessive because of differing activity/bite-force relations in mastication and isometric biting. In nine patients, unilateral bite forces and EMGs of 4 elevator muscles were recorded during chewing and isometric clenching on a bite-fork. We estimated chewing force by substituting chewing EMGs of each muscle into isometric act… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
46
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
46
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be the approach taken when modeling force levels in fossil species when information on relative recruitment levels is not available. It might also be preferred if the relationship between EMG amplitudes of individual jaw muscles and bite force during mastication is weak or difficult to characterize (Ahlgren and Ö wall, 1970;Proeschel and Morneburg, 2002). This has been attributed to the fact that during mastication there are changes in shortening velocity and length of the masticatory muscles and under these circumstances muscle force is not well correlated with EMG amplitudes (Ralston, 1961;Ahlgren and Ö wall, 1970;Weijs, 1980).…”
Section: Muscle Force Estimates In Finite Element Analysis (Fea)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might be the approach taken when modeling force levels in fossil species when information on relative recruitment levels is not available. It might also be preferred if the relationship between EMG amplitudes of individual jaw muscles and bite force during mastication is weak or difficult to characterize (Ahlgren and Ö wall, 1970;Proeschel and Morneburg, 2002). This has been attributed to the fact that during mastication there are changes in shortening velocity and length of the masticatory muscles and under these circumstances muscle force is not well correlated with EMG amplitudes (Ralston, 1961;Ahlgren and Ö wall, 1970;Weijs, 1980).…”
Section: Muscle Force Estimates In Finite Element Analysis (Fea)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As boundary conditions, displacement of all nodes on the lateral surface and base of the cylinder that represent the bone were constrained. Normal chewing forces were in the range 10-50 N (Bosman, 1995), but much higher force peaks can occur in vivo (Körber & Ludwig, 1983;Pröschel & Morneburg, 2002). Maximum biting forces between 500 and 600 N and, sometimes force peaks up to 1000 N, were reported (Ludwig, 1975;Pröschel & others, 1994;Tate & others, 1994;Kleinfelder & Ludwigt, 2002).…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest mastication forces are generated at the end of the chewing cycle when sliding motion stops as the teeth reach the centric occlusion that produces localized abrasion wear of contacting dental surfaces [27,28]. In literature, the maximum biting forces were measured by different methods (e.g., electromyography, occlusal transducers) and are in the range of 89-150 N at the incisors (anterior region), 133-334 N at the canines, 220-445 N at the premolars (intermediary region), and 400-600 N at the molars (posterior region) [32][33][34].…”
Section: Mastication Forces and Distribution Of Stresses Through Strumentioning
confidence: 99%