2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.system.2017.10.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task complexity, modality, and working memory in L2 task performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
25
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
25
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Segalowitz (2010), cognitive processing systems could directly influence individuals' L2 speech production. Such a position resonates with previous studies suggesting that L2 speech production can be subject to influences of cognitive factors such as working memory, speech planning, and cognitive fluency (e.g., Kahng, 2014;Cho, 2018;Li and Fu, 2018). Cognitive fluency, as a major indicator of any cognitive processing system, refers to "the efficiency of operation of the underlying processes responsible for the production of utterances" (Segalowitz, 2010, p. 52).…”
Section: Cognitive Processing System and Cognitive Dimensions Of Speesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…According to Segalowitz (2010), cognitive processing systems could directly influence individuals' L2 speech production. Such a position resonates with previous studies suggesting that L2 speech production can be subject to influences of cognitive factors such as working memory, speech planning, and cognitive fluency (e.g., Kahng, 2014;Cho, 2018;Li and Fu, 2018). Cognitive fluency, as a major indicator of any cognitive processing system, refers to "the efficiency of operation of the underlying processes responsible for the production of utterances" (Segalowitz, 2010, p. 52).…”
Section: Cognitive Processing System and Cognitive Dimensions Of Speesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The above finding is in line with the results of a recent study on the effects of modality on L2 performance, which reported that L2 learners produce higher syntactic complexity in spontaneous production in speaking than in writing (Cho 2018). However, the finding differs somewhat from a related study (Wang and Liu 2017: 142), which reported longer MDD for more formal, written English text than less formal, or writtento-be-spoken text.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The rationale for task repetition efficacy depends on its influence on learner cognitive development, called the Working Memory (WM). WM is described as a succession of mechanisms involved with progressive information handling (Cho, 2018). Although extensive research has been carried out on WM, the issue has its focus limited capacity.…”
Section: Justification For the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as repeated activities stimulate understanding and familiarity with the elements of cognitive benefits, this process overcomes the effects of restricted or limited capability. Such hypotheses are examined through activity repetition studies, and most of these studies have sought to determine if replicating similar activities influenced learner L2 learning (Bayat, 2018;Cho, 2018;Dawadi, 2019;Hopp, 2014). For example, a study conducted on college students examined whether replicating a story and meeting a task after a 10-week interval would help them perform better in most complexity, accuracy and fluency (CAF) regions (Bayat, 2018).…”
Section: Justification For the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%