2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102306
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Task allocation and planning for product disassembly with human–robot collaboration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 230 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a solution to the MATA problem for large-scale industrial tasks in mixed human-robot teams remains NP-hard with exponential complexity [22]. Examples of such formulation, which take inspiration from real-time processor scheduling techniques [15], [20], [23], aim to minimize the overall task completion time. Nevertheless, in human-populated environments, optimally assigning tasks using only task duration as a metric is not sufficient, and often it is necessary to deviate from the original plan.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a solution to the MATA problem for large-scale industrial tasks in mixed human-robot teams remains NP-hard with exponential complexity [22]. Examples of such formulation, which take inspiration from real-time processor scheduling techniques [15], [20], [23], aim to minimize the overall task completion time. Nevertheless, in human-populated environments, optimally assigning tasks using only task duration as a metric is not sufficient, and often it is necessary to deviate from the original plan.…”
Section: A Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within a manufacturing operation, sub-processes can be instinctively allocated to the cobot or the human, based on considerations such as suitability, capability, or human preference. To increase efficiency in a collaborative production environment, a systematic resolution process must be applied to determine which tasks should be conducted by the cobot and which tasks would be best left to a human [50,51]. The individual skillsets of both the cobot and human involved are considered.…”
Section: Task Allocation In Human-robot Collaborationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total task time with the three different methods is evaluated with an additional experiment and an arbitrarily selected task for the human, which considered the same task execution instructions in all three cases. More in detail, the motion of the human is designed so as to cyclically intrude in the robot workspace, while the robot performs a random motion with a nominal duration of 30 s. The experimental results of this example test report a total task time equal to 37.80 s for Approach (1), 51.45 s for Approach (2), and 96.31 s for Approach (3). The proposed approach allows us to achieve a percentage improvement of 26.53% with respect to Approach (2), and of 60.75% if Approach (3) is considered as the reference.…”
Section: T-time R-idle C-act-ws R-stopsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paradigm allows a manipulator to work side-by-side with a human operator and to realize a safe sharing of workspace during manufacturing activities. The need of collaborative robotics application in modern manufacturing is driven by the request of flexibility of tasks and automation settings, and of rapidly variable productivity in lot sizes and time to market [2,3]. Furthermore, the introduction of collaborative robotics can reduce the incidence of occupational risks among the employees, and thus increase their working conditions, while enhancing the performance of the production line [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%