1997
DOI: 10.1590/s1135-57271997000300009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tasas específicas de mortalidad en el hospital de Algeciras durante el período 1995-1996

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The later study showed that the leading causes of death were cardiovascular diseases (36.1%), followed by stroke and cerebrovascular disease (18.2%), accidental injuries (7.9%), cancers (7.7%) and renal diseases (7.2%). Even 16,17 in the two European hospitals cited earlier , there were some similarities in the leading causes of death with our center, where for instance, in the Nikaias Piraeus 16…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The later study showed that the leading causes of death were cardiovascular diseases (36.1%), followed by stroke and cerebrovascular disease (18.2%), accidental injuries (7.9%), cancers (7.7%) and renal diseases (7.2%). Even 16,17 in the two European hospitals cited earlier , there were some similarities in the leading causes of death with our center, where for instance, in the Nikaias Piraeus 16…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…et al . [ 7 ] in a Spanish specialty hospital based on 24,194 episodes of hospitalization. These annual percentages are greater than the estimated 2% of hospital discharges per year due to death considering all Mexican SSA hospitals [ 3 ] and are also higher than the Mexican rate published in the journal Salud Pública de México in 1999 [ 2 ], which reported that 2.62% (35,891/1,469,161) of hospital discharges were due to death each year at the national level and 1.93% at the state level (Guanajuato, where the HRAEB is located) for 1999.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1986, the Health Care Financing Administration has incorporated the hospital mortality rate as a qualitative comparator of American hospitals, which has encouraged the use of hospital care outcome indicators across the world [ 6 ]. Hospital mortality is one of the most frequently used indicators of quality of care [ 7 ], and the quantification of deaths can be considered a measure of the effectiveness of hospital intervention, although it should not be forgotten that this indicator is influenced by other factors, such as the pathology being treated, population structure and accessibility to the hospital unit [ 8 ]. A high percentage of hospital discharges due to death can be associated with deficiencies in the quality of hospital care [ 9 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%