Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2023
DOI: 10.24232/jmd.1232826
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tarsus Kıyı Akiferi’nde (Mersin) Meydana Gelen Tuzlanmanın Nedenlerinin Araştırılması

Abstract: Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’nin Doğu Akdeniz bölgesinde yer alan Tarsus Kıyı Akiferi’nde (Mersin) görülen tuzlanma olayının nedenleri araştırılmıştır. Özellikle Akdeniz havzası genelinde kritik bir problem olan yeraltı sularının tuzlanması olayı, deniz suyu girişimi, iklim değişikliği, jeojenik etkiler (evaporitlerin çözünmesi) ve antropojenik faaliyetler (kirlilik ve hidrolojik müdahaleler) gibi süreçlerin ve mekanizmaların bir sonucu olarak karşımıza çıkmaktadır. Bu kapsamda, Eylül 2020’de yapılan saha çalışmasınd… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to assess potential health risk assessment for nitrate pollution in groundwater of Mersin Province, previously reported data sets that obtained from the different groundwater samples in the Mersin Province. The nitrate data were obtained from the studies of Hatipoğlu and Bayarı (2005), Güler (2009), Demirel et al (2011), Güler et al (2012, Güven et al (2022), and (Table 1). The studied groundwater sampling sites were shown on the map presented in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to assess potential health risk assessment for nitrate pollution in groundwater of Mersin Province, previously reported data sets that obtained from the different groundwater samples in the Mersin Province. The nitrate data were obtained from the studies of Hatipoğlu and Bayarı (2005), Güler (2009), Demirel et al (2011), Güler et al (2012, Güven et al (2022), and (Table 1). The studied groundwater sampling sites were shown on the map presented in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%