Tariffs versus anti-dumping duties

Dinlersoz, Emin; Dogan, Can

doi:10.1016/j.iref.2009.10.007

Cited by 16 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 23 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…• protect infant industries (Shafaeddin, 2000;Baldwin, 1969;Krueger and Tucner, 1982;Harrison, 1994;Melitz, 2005;Sauré, 2007;Panagariya, 2011;Xu, 2006;Clemhout and Wan Jr., 1970); • protect senile industries (Gray, 1973;Hillman, 1982;Choi, 2001;Long and Vousden, 1991;Magee, 2002;Lee and Swagel, 1997;Hillman and Cassing, 1986;Brainard and Verdier, 1997); • undertake anti-dumping actions (Panagariya and Gupta, 1998;Brenton, 2011;Dinlersoz and Dogan, 2010;Cheng et al, 2001); • shape strategic trade policy Krugman, 1994;Brander, 1995;Rugman and Verbeke, 1990;Grossman and Maggi, 1997;Ionaşcu and žigić, 2001). The most frequently raised reason is the need to protect national producers and suppliers, shift demand from imported towards domestic products, and reduce unemployment.…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effects of US import tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from Mexico

Torres¹,

Vázquez²,

Wieloch³

2022

Journal of International Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To this end, mathematical and statistical methods are used to model the effect of tariffs, ex-ante and ex-post, after implementing this trade policy, on exports of aluminum and steel from Mexico to the United States, versus US imports of these metals from the ROW. The results show that the protectionist tariff policy had a structural effect on US imports; likewise, the tariff shock implemented by the United States in June 2018 adversely affected its imports of these goods, both in terms of volume and value. This suggests that bilateral trade may be affected, but the effect is differentiated. The United States may be achieving its objective of protecting its domestic industry or it may impact upwards on the domestic prices of these metals, which could influence the prices paid by the final consumer. For Mexico, trade may be diverted or its export capacity reduced, adversely affecting its trade balance of these metals.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effects of US import tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from Mexico

Torres¹,

Vázquez²,

Wieloch³

2022

Journal of International Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…As the world becomes much more economically globalized along with a globally uneven distribution of resources [12], it is imperative for each nation to understand how to deal with dumping problems and how to implement different antidumping mechanisms effectively. For example, Dinlersoz and Dogan [13] consider the comparative effects of tariffs and antidumping duties, two important tools used to protect local industries from foreign competition while generating revenue. These authors study the effects of anti-dumping systems on prices, profits, government revenue, industry protection, and social welfare in a two-country framework and establish conditions under which one tool dominates the other for a given criterion.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The countermeasures the importing nation [13] could take might include ways to impose fines, increase tariffs, etc. So, the cost for the exporting nation to produce and dump its product will increase and the chance for the exporting nation to move ahead to produce and dump its product will decline.…”

Section: Exporting Nationmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Game Analysis of Trade Dumping and Antidumping

Zhao¹,

Forrest²,

Jirasakuldech³

2018

TEL

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper develops game theoretical models to study the interactive, competitive plays and relevant decision making regarding the dumping and antidumping actions between an importing nation and an exporting nation. The latter considers potentially dumping its product in the domestic market of the former, while the former attempts to protect its market and its domestic firms from exiting the market by implementing necessary trading strategies. Understanding how to deal with potential intruders, when to take actions, and what appropriate actions to take under different sets of conditions is very crucial both theoretically and practically, because countermeasures may or may not be effective depending on what conditions one is constrained with. The theoretical framework, established in this paper, will provide a better understanding of anti-dumping policies and their implications for regulators, policy makers, managers, and academicians, while the results developed herein can be readily employed in real-life scenarios, making this work practically useful for understanding how international trade conflicts could be handled effectively.

show abstract

“…Blonigen and Prusa (2016)'s survey). These works stress several effects of AD actions such as protection effects (Veugelers and Vandenbussche, 1999), collusive effects (Collie and Le, 2010), and substitutes for tariffs (Dinlersoz and Dogan, 2010) or R&D (Gao and Miyagiwa, 2005). Questions related to dumping measures and its determination, and therefore, which type of AD duty to choose are debated in the literature (Sykes, 1996;Blonigen and Prusa, 2016).…”

Section: Related Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Antidumping and Feed-In Tariffs as Good Buddies? Modeling the EU-China Solar Panel Dispute

Bougette¹,

Charlier²

2018

The Energy Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper analyzes the interactions between trade and renewable energy policies based on the EU-China solar panel dispute which is the most significant antidumping (AD) complaint in Europe. We build a price competition duopoly model with differentiated products and intra-industry trade in photovoltaic (PV) equipment. We show that an optimal antidumping duty always increases with the feed-in tariff (FIT) program set in the home country. An appropriate antidumping duty-nullifying the dumping margin-decreases with the FIT program. We show that optimal FIT increases with the AD duty. Therefore, trade and renewable energy optimal policies may complement one another. Lastly, we introduce R&D activities in the PV sector, and international spillovers. We show that R&D makes the optimal FIT lower and increases the dumping margin. These effects are reinforced by technological spillovers.

show abstract

Tariffs versus anti-dumping duties

Cited by 16 publications

References 23 publications

The effects of US import tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from Mexico

The effects of US import tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from Mexico

A Game Analysis of Trade Dumping and Antidumping

Antidumping and Feed-In Tariffs as Good Buddies? Modeling the EU-China Solar Panel Dispute

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About