2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2007.01016.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tariff Liberalisation and Increased Administrative Protection: Is There a Quid Pro Quo?

Abstract: Theoretical models and intuition suggest that the amount of non-traditional protection such as anti-dumping duties will increase as more traditional forms such as tariffs are lowered under multilateral trade agreements. This paper is the first empirical study of the role of tariff liberalisation in the spread of anti-dumping. Through both correlations and regression approaches we analyse the relationship between tariff concessions made during the Uruguay Round trade negotiations and the filing of anti-dumping … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
67
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
67
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moore and Zanardi (2011), who study how past trade liberalization impacts the decision to adopt antidumping laws, demonstrate that except for heavy users of AD among the developing countries there is no statistically significant substitution effect of trade liberalization on AD initiatives. By contrast, Feinberg and Reynolds (2007), who based their analysis on 24 countries for the period from 1996 to 2003, identify that tariff reductions increased both the likelihood and number of AD petitions, especially for developing countries. Their concept of quid pro quo implies a quiet agreement which exists between nations on switching traditional tariff policies by NTMs.…”
Section: Ntms Tariffs and Trade In The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moore and Zanardi (2011), who study how past trade liberalization impacts the decision to adopt antidumping laws, demonstrate that except for heavy users of AD among the developing countries there is no statistically significant substitution effect of trade liberalization on AD initiatives. By contrast, Feinberg and Reynolds (2007), who based their analysis on 24 countries for the period from 1996 to 2003, identify that tariff reductions increased both the likelihood and number of AD petitions, especially for developing countries. Their concept of quid pro quo implies a quiet agreement which exists between nations on switching traditional tariff policies by NTMs.…”
Section: Ntms Tariffs and Trade In The Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Applying the same methodology as Feinberg and Reynolds (2007), specifically to AD investigations by the EU at a more disaggregate product level, Ketterer (2014) finds, however, a small positive impact of bound tariff concessions on AD.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another strand of the empirical literature analyzes possible substitution effects between tariffs and a particu- (Feinberg and Reynolds, 2007). Given these limitations, Moore and Zanardi (2011) conduct a similar study, focusing on applied rather than bound rates and controlling for additional factors that may affect AD initiations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the effect of WTO accession, Aggarwal (2004) infers that anti-dumping increase after the establishment of WTO. Feinberg and Reynolds (2007) infer that countries tend to protect domestic market with anti-dumping after making a commitment of dramatic reductions in tariff in the GATT Uruguay round of negotiations.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%