2010
DOI: 10.5589/m10-078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targets, methods, and sites for assessing the in-flight spatial resolution of electro-optical data products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Conversely, the modulation transfer function (MTF) has historically been a widely-used figure of merit with the value of the MTF at the Nyquist frequency, often forming the system design requirement for sensors. An excellent overview of these measures and their development can be found in [8]. Because ESF and the line spread function (LSF) are often more intuitive than MTF, the results developed in this paper will focus largely on the ESF measurement and its derivative, LSF, as an assessment of the spatial quality of the TIRS instrument.…”
Section: Sensor Spatial Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, the modulation transfer function (MTF) has historically been a widely-used figure of merit with the value of the MTF at the Nyquist frequency, often forming the system design requirement for sensors. An excellent overview of these measures and their development can be found in [8]. Because ESF and the line spread function (LSF) are often more intuitive than MTF, the results developed in this paper will focus largely on the ESF measurement and its derivative, LSF, as an assessment of the spatial quality of the TIRS instrument.…”
Section: Sensor Spatial Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the most part, these can be classified by the type of target that is being used: edge targets, point targets, line targets and pulse targets [8,11]. Although not used universally, edge targets are probably the most widely utilized type of on-orbit targets, as both man-made and natural objects can be identified as suitable edge targets.…”
Section: Sensor Spatial Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A plethora of methods were developed to assess the PSF or the direction line spread functions (LSF) pre-launch or on orbit from remote sensing imagery (see Pagnutti et al [65] for a review). Post-launch methods rely on the presence of highly contrasted targets on the ground that can be knife edges (edge methods) [66][67][68][69], a straight and narrow long object (pulse methods) [66] or a point source (impulse methods) [70].…”
Section: Effective Spatial Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GSD was calculated as the geometric mean of the ground sampled distance based on a projection of the pixel pitch distance to the ground [12,20]. The GSD was computed in inches in both the X and Y dimensions (the along-scan and cross-scan directions, respectively), and we calculated their geometric mean.…”
Section: Niirs Estimation Using the Giqementioning
confidence: 99%