2009
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TargetMiner: microRNA target prediction with systematic identification of tissue-specific negative examples

Abstract: TargetMiner is now available as an online tool at www.isical.ac.in/ approximately bioinfo_miu

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
179
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
179
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, we computed the F-score [35] of each feature as follows: for a set of training vectors x k , k=1, 2,---, m, if the number of positive and negative instances are n + and n -, respectively, then the F-score of the i th feature is defined as: negative samples respectively. To our knowledge, these statistical tests were not employed previously in literature to choose a subset of physicochemical properties of amino acids for the prediction of amyloid fibril segments.…”
Section: Filter Based Pre-selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, we computed the F-score [35] of each feature as follows: for a set of training vectors x k , k=1, 2,---, m, if the number of positive and negative instances are n + and n -, respectively, then the F-score of the i th feature is defined as: negative samples respectively. To our knowledge, these statistical tests were not employed previously in literature to choose a subset of physicochemical properties of amino acids for the prediction of amyloid fibril segments.…”
Section: Filter Based Pre-selection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher rate of false positives in target prediction is due to the close resemblance of real targets with the non-targets. Bandyopadhyay et al suggested a method for systematic identification of negative samples [23]. We have adopted Bandyopadhyay's model with a modification for negative sample preparation.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TargetMiner is a classifier for target prediction trained with negative samples prepared by systematic identification from the false positive targets. They compared their results with predicted targets of 10 different algorithms in terms of specificity, sensitivity and accuracy and reports that accuracy of target prediction tools is still around 70% [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Certain databases have been created using computational predictions and experimental results, for example miRBase (18), miRNAMap2.0 (19), miRGen (20), miRGator v2.0 (21) and miRecords (22). Other databases, such as TargetScan (2), PicTar (23) and TargetMiner (24), are based on algorithms designed to predict microRNA targets according to the complementary pairing with the target. Another database, TarBase (25), uses validated microRNA targets, while RNAhybrid (26) is based on hybridization between miRNA and mRNA.…”
Section: Web-based Tools For Micrornas Involved In Human Cancer (Review)mentioning
confidence: 99%