2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpolmod.2006.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeting versus universalism: An evaluation of indirect effects of the Employment Guarantee Scheme in India

Abstract: Although a workfare scheme is potentially a cost-effective poverty alleviation scheme as it attracts only the poor who have an incentive to do unskilled manual works, an investigation of the ICRISAT data in India clarifies that the Employment Guarantee Scheme was mistargeted, i.e., a substantial share of the non-poor also participated. The comparison of the EGS and universalism through the villagelevel SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) model reveals that the former is neither efficient nor equitable than the latt… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A key self‐targeting mechanism is based on the assumption that only those lacking other opportunities should be attracted to this kind of relatively low‐wage manual work. A direct pro‐poor focus determined by the self‐targeting principle (Besley & Coate, ; Imai, ) and the massive scale of MGNREGS signify its immense social and anti‐poverty potential. Administrative records show that almost 55 million households (approximately 40 per cent of rural Indian households) were provided with an average of 50 days of employment in the financial year 2010–11.…”
Section: Background and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key self‐targeting mechanism is based on the assumption that only those lacking other opportunities should be attracted to this kind of relatively low‐wage manual work. A direct pro‐poor focus determined by the self‐targeting principle (Besley & Coate, ; Imai, ) and the massive scale of MGNREGS signify its immense social and anti‐poverty potential. Administrative records show that almost 55 million households (approximately 40 per cent of rural Indian households) were provided with an average of 50 days of employment in the financial year 2010–11.…”
Section: Background and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In presenting the descriptive summaries of the qualitative and quantitative data, I have attempted to show the links between the two, notwithstanding the necessarily limited nature of the quantitative data set (for example, a single variable on school (Sudarshan et al, 2010). Some elite capture due to high wage rates, which have distorted local labour markets (Imai, 2007;Scandizzo et al, 2009). Examples of mismanagement and corruption (Camfield and Vennam, 2012) attendance).…”
Section: Analytical Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to S. Sashi, no selection and worker-targeting are done to get the most indigent of the villagers to benefit from the scheme (Imai, 2007). Anybody who is willing to work is accommodated, the only requirement being that the ubiquitous ration card (a document issued by state governments to enable the holder to purchase subsidised essential commodities from fair-price shops) must be presented for the making of the job card.…”
Section: Chronicles From the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%