Targeting the impact of agri-environmental policy – Future scenarios in two less favoured areas in Portugal

Abstract

Targeting agri-environmental measures (AEM) improves their effectiveness in the delivery of public goods, provided the necessary coordination with other incentives. In less favoured areas (LFA) measures focusing on the conservation of extensive farming contribute to sustainable land management in these areas. In this paper we investigate the implementation of a possible AEM supporting the improvement of permanent pastures coordinated with the extensive livestock and single farm payments actually in place. Through applying a spatially-explicit mixed integer optimisation model we simulate future land use scenarios for two less favoured areas in Portugal (Centro and Alentejo) considering two policy scenarios: a 'targeted AEM', and a 'non-targeted AEM'. We then compare the results with a 'basic policy' option (reflecting a situation without AEM). This is done with regard to landscape-scale effects on the reduction of fire hazard and erosion risk, as well as effects on farm income. The results show that an AEM for permanent pastures would be more costeffective for erosion and fire hazard mitigation if implemented within a spatially targeted framework. However when cost-effectiveness is assessed with other indicators (e.g. net farm income and share of grazing livestock) 'non-targeted AEM' implementation delivers the best outcome in Alentejo. In Centro the implementation of an AEM involves important losses of income compared to the 'basic policy'. 'Targeted AEM' tends to favour farms in very marginal conditions, i.e. targeting is demonstrated to perform best in landscapes where spatial heterogeneity is higher. The results also show the risk of farm abandonment in the two studied less favoured areas: in all three scenarios more than 30% of arable land is deemed to be abandoned.

Using spatial models of temporal tree dynamics to evaluate the implementation of EU afforestation policies in rangelands of SW Spain

“…When managing the marginal agricultural areas, two main approaches have been proposed: to prevent land abandonment or to favor land restoration (Pereira et al, 2005). During the last decades, due to globalization, low-input farming systems with diversified activities as dehesas or montados, have lost competitiveness in comparison to intensive farming (Jones et al, 2016). The socioeconomic trends in Europe make it difficult to prevent land abandonment in the long term.…”

Effects of large herbivores on fire regimes and wildfire mitigation

“…Fourth, in regions with strong land abandonment (Jones & Fleskens, 2016;Loepfe et al, 2010), as well as in wilderness areas, we recommend the use of wild and semi-wild herbivores for reducing wildfire risk (see Figure S4). In places vulnerable to wildfires, encouraging populations of native wild herbivores (e.g.…”

“…Fourth, in regions with strong land abandonment (Jones & Fleskens, 2016;Loepfe et al, 2010), as well as in wilderness areas,…”

Exploring the feasibility of setting up community allotments on abandoned agricultural land: A place, people, policy approach

“…Such abandonment can have positive ecological effects, through vegetation recolonization and secondary succession and through strengthening of a variety of ecosystem services (Novara et al, 2017). However, it can also result in loss of species richness in areas with rich agrobiodiversity (Agnoletti, 2014) and, particularly in the Mediterranean, raises concerns about increased risk of fire and soil erosion (Ursino and Romano, 2014;Jones et al, 2016). In the absence of effective land use zoning and planning mechanisms, abandonment could also potentially open up tracts of currently rural land to urban speculative development (Russo et al, 2014).…”