Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1159/000510998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeting the Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Family in Breast Cancer beyond HER2

Abstract: Currently, the dichotomous definition of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive versus HER2-negative disease undergoing a change through inclusion of the identification of the “HER2-low” category, for which new therapeutic compounds in the form of potent antibody drug conjugates (ADC) may be effective. In addition, resistance to HER2-directed targets has become a clinical challenge and, therefore, strategies to bypass the HER2 receptor are of high interest. These are new HER2 ADCs and tyrosin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the emergence of the antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) has provided new treatment decisions for patients with low HER2 expression. Breast cancer classified as negative in a certain proportion (approximately 45-55%) (2)(3)(4) actually belong to the newly proposed HER2-low. Breast cancer with an immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 1+ or 2+ and unamplified by in situ hybridization (ISH) is referred to as HER2low breast cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the emergence of the antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) has provided new treatment decisions for patients with low HER2 expression. Breast cancer classified as negative in a certain proportion (approximately 45-55%) (2)(3)(4) actually belong to the newly proposed HER2-low. Breast cancer with an immunohistochemistry (IHC) score of 1+ or 2+ and unamplified by in situ hybridization (ISH) is referred to as HER2low breast cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In clinical practice, international guidelines recommend a binary distinction between HER2-positive (HER2+) and HER2-negative (HER2−) BCs, to guide physicians’ treatment decisions [ 6 ]. However, a relevant proportion (≈45–55%) of tumors that are classified as HER2− are in fact what is now called HER2-low [ 7 , 8 , 9 ]. The HER2-low BC subtype represents a new recently proposed nomenclature for those tumors with an immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay score of 1+ or 2+ but with negative in situ hybridization (ISH) assay [ 7 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In daily clinical practice, therapeutic choice is still driven by the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and hormone-receptor (HR) status, since gene expression profiling is not routinely available. Although tumors harboring HER2 positivity are characterized by a more aggressive behavior and poorer prognosis than other subtypes, the development of several anti-HER2 targeted agents has dramatically improved the survival outcomes of HER2 positive (HER2+) BC patients, both in early and advanced settings [ 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. According to the dichotomic classification proposed by the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines, about 80% of breast tumors, lacking HER2 protein overexpression, are classified as HER2 negative (HER2-); within them, approximately 45–55% are characterized by HER2 immunohistochemistry (IHC) assay score of 1+ or 2+ with negative in situ hybridization (ISH), referred to as HER2-low BC [ 9 , 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%