2017
DOI: 10.7554/elife.21687
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeting of the Fun30 nucleosome remodeller by the Dpb11 scaffold facilitates cell cycle-regulated DNA end resection

Abstract: DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) can be repaired by either recombination-based or direct ligation-based mechanisms. Pathway choice is made at the level of DNA end resection, a nucleolytic processing step, which primes DSBs for repair by recombination. Resection is thus under cell cycle control, but additionally regulated by chromatin and nucleosome remodellers. Here, we show that both layers of control converge in the regulation of resection by the evolutionarily conserved Fun30/SMARCAD1 remodeller. Budding yea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

7
105
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(116 reference statements)
7
105
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with the recruitment of Fun30 to DSBs, SMARCAD1 was also found to be recruited to laser-induced DNA damage sites and nuclease-induced DSBs, where γH2AX is co-localised [12]. More recently, the functions of Fun30 as a target of CDK phosphorylation [10,11,14] and SMARCAD1 at DSBs are found to be cell cycle regulated [15,16]. All these data suggest an evolutionarily conserved role for the Fun30 and SMARCAD1 chromatin remodelers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Consistent with the recruitment of Fun30 to DSBs, SMARCAD1 was also found to be recruited to laser-induced DNA damage sites and nuclease-induced DSBs, where γH2AX is co-localised [12]. More recently, the functions of Fun30 as a target of CDK phosphorylation [10,11,14] and SMARCAD1 at DSBs are found to be cell cycle regulated [15,16]. All these data suggest an evolutionarily conserved role for the Fun30 and SMARCAD1 chromatin remodelers.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Residual Rad9 binding to chromatin is observed in mutants deficient for 9-1-1 resulting in only partial de-repression of resection at DSBs (57,63). The positive function of 9-1-1 in resection is through recruitment of the Fun30 SMARCAD1 chromatin remodeler (64), which counteracts the negative effect of Rad9 on resection (40, 41, 64, 65). In addition, Slx4-Rtt107 competes with Rad9 for binding to γH2A and to Dpb11.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human EXO1 is also activated for end resection by CDK (68). The other positive action of CDK is by phosphorylation of Fun30 and Slx4, which is required for their interaction with Dpb11, and hence to 9-1-1 at the recessed 5' end (47, 64,69). While Mec1 and Tel1-mediated phosphorylation of Sae2 is important for resection (70), Mec1 and Tel1 act to repress extensive resection via recruitment of Rad9 and Rad53 to DSBs (71).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, a number of nucleosome remodeling factors have been linked to HR (Chai et al, 2005;Kalocsay et al, 2009;Morrison et al, 2004;Shim et al, 2007). One of the best documented examples in this regard is Fun30 (human SMARCAD1), which is critical for the extended generation of ssDNA during DNA end resection (Bantele et al, 2017;Chen et al, 2012Chen et al, , 2016Costelloe et al, 2012;Eapen et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%