1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0960-894x(99)00363-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeting nitric oxide to cancer cells: cytotoxicity studies of glyco-S-nitrosothiols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although NO concentration can be directly manipulated, it is more challenging to control release kinetics and site-specific delivery of NO. To address these challenges various delivery platforms have been explored [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although NO concentration can be directly manipulated, it is more challenging to control release kinetics and site-specific delivery of NO. To address these challenges various delivery platforms have been explored [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various NO-based therapeutics have been utilized in cancer research, including nitrated fatty acids, NO-loaded nanoparticles, and NO-donors [25][26][27][28][29][32][33][34][35][36]40]. NO-donors including diazeniumdiolates and RSNOs have been successfully applied to influence or control NO release kinetics in anticancer research [25][26][27][28][29]32,33,40]. Diazeniumdiolates, which consist of two moles of NO per molecule (vs one mole of NO per RSNO molecule), result in higher concentrations of NO-release than RSNOs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cytotoxicity of glucose-2-SNAP (E.2) and fructose-2-SNAP (E.4) were evaluated and compared against E.1 using DU-145 human prostate cells in vitro. E.2 was found to be 4× more cytotoxic than E.1, while E.4 was found to be 13× more cytotoxic than E.1 (Hou et al 1999a). …”
Section: Nitrosothiols (Rsnos)mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The inflammatory process which is involved in wound healing evades the normal wound healing process bysubtle modifications in the cancer milieu. In cancer, the Tregs, MDSCs and TAMs exhibit pro-tumoural functions and participate in suppression of adaptive immunity [2,10,14,27,28,[29][30][31][32]. The immature myeloid cells from the bone marrow that are normally involved in woundhealing exhibit a state of immune suppression during carcinogenesis [33][34][35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumor-associated macrophages exhibit pro-tumoural functions and participate in suppression of adaptive immunity [11]. They also exhibit functional plasticity and also show reversible adaptation to changing environments [16,28].The TAMs, MDSCs, dendritic cells, NK cells, tumor cells, neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, and endothelial cells have been reported to release NO and free radicals, which influence physiological functions in the tumor microenvironment [10,11,19,21,[29][30][31][32].…”
Section: Free Radical Releasing Cells In Tumor Milieumentioning
confidence: 99%