2019
DOI: 10.1021/acsinfecdis.9b00265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeting Bacterial Sortase A with Covalent Inhibitors: 27 New Starting Points for Structure-Based Hit-to-Lead Optimization

Abstract: Because of its essential role as a bacterial virulence factor, enzyme sortase A (SrtA) has become an attractive target for the development of new antivirulence drugs against Gram-positive infections. Here we describe 27 compounds identified as covalent inhibitors of Staphylococcus aureus SrtA by screening a library of approximately 50 000 compounds using a FRET assay followed by NMR-based validation and binding reversibility analysis. Nineteen of these compounds displayed only moderate to weak cytotoxicity, wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(73 reference statements)
2
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research campaigns investigated competitive‐reversible S. aureus SrtA inhibitors including promising scaffolds such as 2‐morpholinobenzoates, thiadiazoles, 2‐phenylthiazoles, macrocyclic peptides, 2‐phenylbenzoxazoles, and various other inhibitors . However, the most active compounds were found to be irreversible covalent inhibitors containing an electrophilic warhead that reacts with the active‐site Cys126 of SrtA . While having significant inhibition in the low micromolar range, they typically exhibit poor target selectivity or are cytotoxic such as quinones, rhodanines, or benzisothiazolinones .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous research campaigns investigated competitive‐reversible S. aureus SrtA inhibitors including promising scaffolds such as 2‐morpholinobenzoates, thiadiazoles, 2‐phenylthiazoles, macrocyclic peptides, 2‐phenylbenzoxazoles, and various other inhibitors . However, the most active compounds were found to be irreversible covalent inhibitors containing an electrophilic warhead that reacts with the active‐site Cys126 of SrtA . While having significant inhibition in the low micromolar range, they typically exhibit poor target selectivity or are cytotoxic such as quinones, rhodanines, or benzisothiazolinones .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the IC 50 value of orientin against S. aureus SrtA in vitro was significantly lower than that of natural product inhibitors reported previously, such as quercetin, kaempferol, galangin, and isorhamnetin [9], which means that orientin may be more effective in inhibiting SrtA. In addition, inhibitors of SrtA can be categorized as either covalent or non-covalent [58,59]. If there is a choice, drug developers prefer non-covalent inhibitors to covalent modify enzyme inhibitors, which overcome the drawbacks of covalent inhibitors, such as high toxicity, nonrecoverability, non-repairability, and other side effects [60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…We identified the natural compound Tax that could block SrtA activity, with an IC 50 of 24.53 ± 0.42 μM. Inhibitors of SrtA can be categorized as either covalent or non-covalent ( Jackson et al, 2017 ; Jaudzems et al, 2020 ). The formation of covalent bonds occurs via the reaction of an inhibitor with the cysteine active site ( Hou et al, 2018 ; Barthels et al, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%