2016
DOI: 10.1002/jcb.25644
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeted Transcriptional Profiling of Microdissected Biopsy Specimens Representing Early Colonic Neoplasia

Abstract: Our incomplete understanding of the critical changes that accompany the earliest stages of tumor initiation provides a substantial hurdle for the development of novel intervention strategies for cancer prevention. Premalignant lesions are inherently difficult to characterize given their diminutive size, creating technical obstacles for accurate genetic profiling. Here, we describe an approach combining laser-capture microdissection (LCM) with targeted RNA-sequencing to study the transcriptional state of epithe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(25 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our system, the shorter incubation time in the QIAGEN kit did not significantly affect the RNA yield/area, suggesting that longer lysis incubation times negatively affect RNA quality without much gain in RNA yield. Interestingly, when comparing previous LCM articles that used either PicoPure (Butler et al, 2016; Mo et al, 2016) or QIAGEN (Wang et al, 2009; Cummings et al, 2011) kits for RNA isolation, those that used the QIAGEN kit reported higher RIN values compared to those that used the PicoPure kit, confirming that our findings are robust and translatable to many different types of samples. One study (Mo et al, 2016), also compared RNA isolated using the PicoPure kit with another RNA extraction kit, RNAqueous-Micro Kit, that reportedly had faster extraction times at a lower temperature and a smaller elution volume.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In our system, the shorter incubation time in the QIAGEN kit did not significantly affect the RNA yield/area, suggesting that longer lysis incubation times negatively affect RNA quality without much gain in RNA yield. Interestingly, when comparing previous LCM articles that used either PicoPure (Butler et al, 2016; Mo et al, 2016) or QIAGEN (Wang et al, 2009; Cummings et al, 2011) kits for RNA isolation, those that used the QIAGEN kit reported higher RIN values compared to those that used the PicoPure kit, confirming that our findings are robust and translatable to many different types of samples. One study (Mo et al, 2016), also compared RNA isolated using the PicoPure kit with another RNA extraction kit, RNAqueous-Micro Kit, that reportedly had faster extraction times at a lower temperature and a smaller elution volume.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The ability to generate tissue-specific expression profiles can significantly expand our knowledge on the pathophysiological mechanisms of different diseases, providing information on functional elements and molecular constituents of the tissues and identifying new diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers [ 1 ]. High-throughput gene expression profiling through next generation sequencing (NGS) has several advantages over microarray technology, such as single-nucleotide resolution and the possibility to study the entire RNA content of a single cell, cell populations or tissues starting from nanograms quantities of input material [ 2 , 3 ]. Moreover, by assaying millions of transcripts in RNA sequencing data, it is also possible to discover gene fusion, alternative splicing and novel isoforms expanding the complexity of gene expression field not possible with microarray technology [ 1 , 2 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, LCM enables the isolation of homogeneous populations of cells from histologically complex tissues sections 31 . This approach results in satisfactory quality and quantity of RNA for subsequent experiments, such as microarray analyses 32,33 . It is a valuable technique that permits extraction of deeply embedded cells from tissues and has multiple advantages compared to conventional techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%