2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2005.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Targeted Total Marrow Irradiation Using Three-Dimensional Image-Guided Tomographic Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: An Alternative to Standard Total Body Irradiation

Abstract: Total body irradiation (TBI) is an important part of bone marrow transplantation conditioning regimens. In TBI, dose escalation is difficult, because of associated normal organ toxicities. A method to deliver a more targeted dose of TBI preferentially to sites of greatest tumor burden is needed to reduce the dose to normal organs, reduce toxicities, and permit dose escalation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, through a dosimetric analysis, the potential advantages and feasibility of selectively deliv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
154
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
154
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Total marrow irradiation using helical tomography was delivered to one patient, who experienced a blood count nadir followed by successful engraftment, accompanied by limited nausea and vomiting, and no erythema, oral mucositis or esophagitis. 73 Certainly, these preliminary studies support further investigation into clinical feasibility of use of helical tomotherapy for delivery of TBI with sparing of critical normal structures. This technique may allow delivery of myeloablative doses to a broader range of patients if toxicity to normal critical structures can be limited clinically (Table 3).…”
Section: Tli For Immunosuppression During Bmtmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Total marrow irradiation using helical tomography was delivered to one patient, who experienced a blood count nadir followed by successful engraftment, accompanied by limited nausea and vomiting, and no erythema, oral mucositis or esophagitis. 73 Certainly, these preliminary studies support further investigation into clinical feasibility of use of helical tomotherapy for delivery of TBI with sparing of critical normal structures. This technique may allow delivery of myeloablative doses to a broader range of patients if toxicity to normal critical structures can be limited clinically (Table 3).…”
Section: Tli For Immunosuppression During Bmtmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…72 Treatment planning time did not appear to differ significantly between the two techniques, although treatment delivery took a longer period of time when tomotherapy was employed. Wong et al 73 performed a similar study evaluating use of tomotherapy to treat the total marrow (target region skeletal bone) as well as the major lymph node chains, spleen and sanctuary sites. They demonstrated a 1.7-7.5-fold reduction in median organ dose with these techniques compared with conventional TBI.…”
Section: Tli For Immunosuppression During Bmtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All treatment plans to date have used a beam energy of 6 MV, however, the retrospective planning study presented in this manuscript aims to investigate the effects of using a 10 MV beam for TMI VMAT fields in comparison to 6 MV. High energy beams (10–18 MV) have historically been a part of TBI treatments, particularly for patients of thickness greater than 35 cm;3, 22 however, published experience with modulated TMI fields has been limited to 6 MV IMRT and VMAT or helical tomotherapy 14, 15, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28. Potential disadvantages of increasing beam energy include larger penumbra and the production of secondary neutrons originating in the head of the linac.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays the majority of clinics still use the conventional TBI techniques mentioned above except for a few trials [4][5][6], which simply apply AP and PA fields without using Multileaf Collimator (MLC) to modulate the beams delivering prescribed doses to different body parts. 3D treatment plan technique is also not used for the treatments, which means that the detail dose distributions are not available for evaluating the treatments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%